>B. Gimeno  on date 19/10/2010 23:16 wrote:
> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
>
> B. Gimeno
Lol!
Paolo

Post a reply to this message

On 10/20/2010 1:26 AM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> "B. Gimeno"<bgi### [at] lycoses>  wrote:
>> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
>> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
>
> I like it! It's always a fun shape to play with :)
>
perhaps it would be quicker to list the words that do not describe it.

Post a reply to this message

some_yahoo <no### [at] waycom> wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 1:26 AM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> > "B. Gimeno"<bgi### [at] lycoses>  wrote:
> >> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> >> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
> >
> > I like it! It's always a fun shape to play with :)
> >
> perhaps it would be quicker to list the words that do not describe it.

Ook, ook!
Ook?

Ook Gimeno

Post a reply to this message

On 21/10/2010 9:20 PM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> some_yahoo<no### [at] waycom>  wrote:
>> On 10/20/2010 1:26 AM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
>>> "B. Gimeno"<bgi### [at] lycoses>   wrote:
>>>> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
>>>> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
>>>
>>> I like it! It's always a fun shape to play with :)
>>>
>> perhaps it would be quicker to list the words that do not describe it.
>
> Ook, ook!
> Ook?
>
> Ook Gimeno
>

Keep taking the dried frog pills ;-)

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 10/20/2010 12:16 AM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.

  I don't think it could be solved because it's not possible to perform
the necessary rotations.

Post a reply to this message

Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 12:16 AM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> > Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> > to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
>
>   I don't think it could be solved because it's not possible to perform
> the necessary rotations.

Ironically, your post was answered even before it is released. (Ook!)

On the other hand, it is questionable if you use sarcasm as a weapon, which I
prefer to believe rather than think a guy as smart as you lack the sensitivity
needed to see art in front of his nose.

No response is required. Thanks.

B. Gimeno

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:55:22 -0400, B. Gimeno wrote:

> On the other hand, it is questionable if you use sarcasm as a weapon,
> which I prefer to believe rather than think a guy as smart as you lack
> the sensitivity needed to see art in front of his nose.

Oh, come on, Warp was making a joke.

I thought it was a good image AND a good joke. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 10/28/2010 11:53 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:55:22 -0400, B. Gimeno wrote:
> 
>> On the other hand, it is questionable if you use sarcasm as a weapon,
>> which I prefer to believe rather than think a guy as smart as you lack
>> the sensitivity needed to see art in front of his nose.
> 
> Oh, come on, Warp was making a joke.
> 
> I thought it was a good image AND a good joke. :-)

  It was indeed humor. (I don't use smilies unless I think there is a
great risk of confusion. I didn't think this was such a case.)

Post a reply to this message

Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 11:53 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:55:22 -0400, B. Gimeno wrote:
> >
> >> On the other hand, it is questionable if you use sarcasm as a weapon,
> >> which I prefer to believe rather than think a guy as smart as you lack
> >> the sensitivity needed to see art in front of his nose.
> >
> > Oh, come on, Warp was making a joke.
> >
> > I thought it was a good image AND a good joke. :-)
>
>   It was indeed humor. (I don't use smilies unless I think there is a
> great risk of confusion. I didn't think this was such a case.)


Maybe I should apologize for my previous post. Take the pov macros to real world
can be destabilizing my sanity and / or my sense of humor.

B. Gimeno

pd. it's only origami, nothing to do with pov.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'rl.jpg' (132 KB)

Preview of image 'rl.jpg'

On 31/10/2010 3:28 PM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> pd. it's only origami,

Only origami? o_O

Nice one.

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message