 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:24:47 -0400, SharkD <mik### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>clipka wrote:
>> triple_r schrieb:
>>> Sorry. This one's much more interesting. Again, just a box and
>>> plane, no image
>>> maps, and one pass.
>>
>> You mean, there /is/ no spoon... um, I mean, sphere?!
>
>We're supposed to guess............ I guess. !!??
>
Something, someone said in the Matrix I, II or III ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> Raytracing with SDL? ...at least this is what suggests the image name.
Yep. It's just a simple raytracer, written with POV-Ray functions. The box
just has a function for the pigment. The second one just has the exact same
viewpoint and ambient 1 for the trompe l'oeil effect. I got sick of it before
implementing reflections...
The motivation was the talk of parallax-mapping, which got me wondering to what
extent POV-Ray functions could be used, well, for raytracing. I still think
with some iterative method that parallax-mapping could be achieved, only I
don't think it would be efficient by the time it's done.
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> If only I had /any/ substantial idea... if I can't sleep tonight it's
> Ricky's fault :-)
Sorry to keep you up, but we all have to sleep sometime, so the delay was my
chance!
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> > I don't think I need to tell you that it's, of course, one pass with only a
> > plane and a box. Certainly no image maps.
> >
>
> Raytracing with SDL? ...at least this is what suggests the image name.
Quite right. Interesting. That was quicker than the others, ergo I intuit that
you've discovered the quintessential human delusion, whereby I entered the
matrix--er, function, and... uh... apropos? Darn. I'm kinda running out of
steam here...
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
triple_r wrote:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
>> triple_r escribi�:
>>> I don't think I need to tell you that it's, of course, one pass with only a
>>> plane and a box. Certainly no image maps.
>>>
>> Raytracing with SDL? ...at least this is what suggests the image name.
>
> Quite right. Interesting. That was quicker than the others, ergo I intuit that
> you've discovered the quintessential human delusion, whereby I entered the
> matrix--er, function, and... uh... apropos? Darn. I'm kinda running out of
> steam here...
>
> - Ricky
>
Then you should have said, "one pass with only a plane and a box, _and a
raytracer written in SDL_." :)
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
triple_r wrote:
> Oops. I didn't add the attachment.
It took me a minute, but now I see the box :)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
