 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"stbenge" <" <-"@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:49ee2a1c@news.povray.org...
> Yes, there is a new version. I never released it because I thought nobody
> was interested. One person is enough for me :) There are a couple of very
> minor changes I need to make to the code and then it will be released post
> haste!
Never assume that, Sam! Without exageration, all the utilities coming out of
your hands are highly appreciated and waited for impatiently by many from
this community. I cannot imagine a day when somebody would grumble: "Oh
dear! Another useless piece of code from Sam? When is he going to shut
down??" :-)
You certainly are one of the top creative drivers of POV-Ray.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Carlo C. wrote:
> Luminous bloom is a miracle of code, for me (I am a perpetual beginner), and I
> still have to finish to understand the mechanisms!
> Oh thank you, today is a bright day!
You're welcome! The file is now at p.b.scene-files. Have fun :)
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote:
> "stbenge" <" <-"@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
> news:49ee2a1c@news.povray.org...
>> Yes, there is a new version. I never released it because I thought nobody
>> was interested. One person is enough for me :)
>
> Never assume that, Sam! Without exageration, all the utilities coming out of
> your hands are highly appreciated and waited for impatiently by many from
> this community. I cannot imagine a day when somebody would grumble: "Oh
> dear! Another useless piece of code from Sam? When is he going to shut
> down??" :-)
> You certainly are one of the top creative drivers of POV-Ray.
Thank you for the kind words, Thomas. The new version has been posted at
p.b.scene-files if you're interested.
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Carlo C. wrote:
> A 2d experiment, granite, granite, granite... rotten granite.
> Personally I find this granite obscene.
> POV-Ray, obviously, no-antialias, with minor postprocessing: contrast and
> saturation.
Looks like a boulder that's been bird-bombed a great deal.
Or a Rothko painting.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> Carlo C. wrote:
> > A 2d experiment, granite, granite, granite... rotten granite.
> > Personally I find this granite obscene.
> > POV-Ray, obviously, no-antialias, with minor postprocessing: contrast and
> > saturation.
>
> Looks like a boulder that's been bird-bombed a great deal.
>
> Or a Rothko painting.
>
> Regards,
> John
I tend to your first sentence! :-D
Wrapped by my ignorance, I did not know Rothko, but he seems an interesting
artist.
Thanks for your comment, John.
:-)
--
Carlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
> Wrapped by my ignorance, I did not know Rothko, but he seems an interesting
> artist.
>
>
>
I am sure he meant Pollock, not Rothko
http://tinyurl.com/c96yye
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote:
>
> I am sure he meant Pollock, not Rothko
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c96yye
Oh, I am Charles C. Pollock! ;-)
Thank you, Jim.
--
Carlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
>
>>
>> Wrapped by my ignorance, I did not know Rothko, but he seems an
>> interesting
>> artist.
>
> I am sure he meant Pollock, not Rothko
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c96yye
Thank you for the correction. I tend to place all purveyors of crap
into the same category.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in bericht
news:49f6ed7f$1@news.povray.org...
> Thank you for the correction. I tend to place all purveyors of crap into
> the same category.
Ouch! That hurts.... :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
> Jim Charter wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> Wrapped by my ignorance, I did not know Rothko, but he seems an
>>> interesting
>>> artist.
>>
>>
>> I am sure he meant Pollock, not Rothko
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/c96yye
>
>
> Thank you for the correction. I tend to place all purveyors of crap
> into the same category.
>
Never-the-less, the similarity between the Rotten Granite and 'Lavender
Mist' is quite remarkable.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
