 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonart com> schreef in bericht
news:web.4988ca09daf818efda29fa390@news.povray.org...
>I know I said I didn't have more time to work on it at present, and it's
>true, I
> don't. But sometimes my distractions overpower my focus.
>
> I think this is a significant improvement over the previous images.
>
Nice atmosphere indeed.
One strange feature in the back: a roof sticking through an arcade.
A few more domes, please?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ooh...
Excellent! It seems to be ready to be populated...
;-)
Paolo
>Kirk Andrews on date 03/02/2009 23:49 wrote:
> I know I said I didn't have more time to work on it at present, and it's true, I
> don't. But sometimes my distractions overpower my focus.
>
> I think this is a significant improvement over the previous images.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress> wrote:
> This is cool. I liked the previous one better though, because it looked like
> I could walk around it more. On this one I see too many rooftops.
>
> - Slime
> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Good point. I'm trying to figure out a way to add in stairs and tunnels, which
should help with that.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
> "Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonartcom> schreef in bericht
> news:web.4988ca09daf818efda29fa390@news.povray.org...
> >I know I said I didn't have more time to work on it at present, and it's
> >true, I
> > don't. But sometimes my distractions overpower my focus.
> >
> > I think this is a significant improvement over the previous images.
> >
>
> Nice atmosphere indeed.
>
> One strange feature in the back: a roof sticking through an arcade.
>
> A few more domes, please?
>
> Thomas
Thanks.
I think that's three calls for more domes, now. I had turned their frequency
way down because I felt like they weren't "fitting in" very well. I'll see
what I can do.
Yes, I noticed the roof/arcade problem after it rendered.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Kirk Andrews wrote:
> > I think this is a significant improvement over the previous images.
>
> This is very very cool. :-) How about a dual-monitor-wallpaper version?
>
> (If it takes a while, I'd be happy to render it and give it back to you if I
> can keep the picture itself. :-)
>
> --
> Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
> "Ouch ouch ouch!"
> "What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
> "No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
2400x900? Should be done rendering in a couple hours.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews wrote:
> 2400x900? Should be done rendering in a couple hours.
2560x1024, but that'll work too. :) Thanks!
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Kirk Andrews wrote:
> > 2400x900? Should be done rendering in a couple hours.
>
> 2560x1024, but that'll work too. :) Thanks!
>
> --
> Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
> "Ouch ouch ouch!"
> "What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
> "No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Close enough, right?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'palace2400x900.jpg' (432 KB)
Preview of image 'palace2400x900.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews wrote:
> Close enough, right?
Awesome. The 3-point perspective even works with the dual-monitors. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews escreveu:
> I know I said I didn't have more time to work on it at present, and it's true, I
> don't. But sometimes my distractions overpower my focus.
>
> I think this is a significant improvement over the previous images.
It's friggin' beautiful!
Now go back to work. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews wrote:
> I think this is a significant improvement over the previous images.
BTW, what kind of technique did you use to ensure you didn't have (for
example) balconies without doors leading to them, or something like that?
(Other than the one that looks like it needs a trap door... :-)
I.e., what does the top-level loop look like, in general terms?
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
