 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"triple_r" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> I really like it, but the colors look just a little flat for stone. Not that
> this is a particularly vibrant example, but notice the light and dark flecks of
> color and the variation from stone to stone:
There is some subtle variation on the stone texture for the bricks, but not the
sphere. I think you're right though... I'll experiment.
> Maybe some mortar? And perhaps some vines for the vertical surface?
Never tried vines, and I'm not sure I will for this image, but mortar has some
possibilities. I wasn't sure to start with, but I've just thought of a way to
do it!
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlDOTnet> wrote:
> Very nice indeed.
Thx!
> I would expect the grass growing more densely on the upper half of the
> sphere than on the lower one (less direct light).
Similar to Mike's suggestion... I shall give it a go.
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote:
> Wondering how you placed the grass at the recesses of the sphere,
> trace() against the deforming texture?
No, just trace() against the sphere union, and only place grass if the point's
distance from the centre is under a threshold value.
> btw, I thought of this and snapped a few shots:
Cool. I'm definitely going for the narrow-crevice very-bushy-clump look, but
probably with lots of dead blades (straw-coloured) and some long stalks too.
These mages could come in handy. I can't keep running outside to stare at the
road!
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
