|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
triple_r wrote:
> "triple_r" <rre### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>> I think it would require a direct patch into
>> POV-Ray to fix the problem.
>
> So with very little effort, here's the result of my patched POV. It's hardly
> fair to call it that since it's only a couple lines and there's no SDL
> interface for it. It just reads a grayscale ppm file and varies the density of
> the sample grid according to the image. You can even tell the difference
> without the strong highlights which makes me wonder why the default is a square
> aperture. Not quite sure when that would be preferable, but maybe people don't
> use strong focal blur too often.
>
> - Ricky
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Sweet! it even inverts the aperture shape properly. Nice :) Now, if you
could add a parameter to the camera SDL to grab a bokeh map, or define
blades, curvature for aperture, you'd really have something.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |