 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Txemi Jendrix" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.46964f6da9a26f01c15fd3960@news.povray.org...
> Hi all.
> It's a new version without the sphere, using a pointlight inside the cube
> instead.
> I've added some rubies and a plane for the ground.
> The lights use fade distance and fade power.
> Hope you like it.
Ooooh, nice! You do know that it would be a helluva job for a jeweller
to produce this? ;)
~Steve~
>
> Txemi Jendrix
> http://www.txemijendrix.com
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mike the Elder" <zer### [at] wyan org> wrote:
> "Txemi Jendrix" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Looking good! What's the render time on something like this?
At 800x600: 2 minutes and 1 second.
Hardware: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ (2.21 GHz each
processor) and 1 Gb of ram.
Software: WinXP and the latest beta of Povray 3.7.
I still have to try it in Linux, using a 64 bits OS (Sabayon).
> Regards,
> Mike C.
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stefan Viljoen <spa### [at] removethispolardcom> wrote:
>
> Ooo x2!
:-) (-:
> This image just gets better and better...
Glad you like it Stefan.
> --
> Stefan
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"milco2006" <mil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>
> I absolutely love it. I have personally worked a little recently with some
> stained glass surrounded by lead however this is stunning and makes half of
> me want to try a lot harder and the other half of me want to quite and leave
> it to people like yourself.
Thank you Malcolm.
Well, these are only some tori and cylinders for the cube and spheres for
the rubies, a plane, three materials and 2 lights. I'm sure that working
with actual lead and stained glass is much more difficult.
> IMHO (Very humbled indeed)it looks slightly strange having the very dark and
> strong shadow behind the cube. I am not sure how it would look but I would
> be interested to see how it would appear with just the light from within,
> like a lantern sort of thing I guess. The only reason I mention it is that
> I love the pattern given out onto the plane. No criticism really, just a
> thought.
My first try was at using only one light inside the cube, but the cube
itself looked weird. The pattern given onto the plane was beautiful and
I've tried to keep both elements (the cube and the pattern) in the scene.
> ~Malcolm
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
> Ooooh, nice! You do know that it would be a helluva job for a jeweller
> to produce this? ;)
>
> ~Steve~
Hi Steve, thanks. I suppose that something very similar had been produced in
the past as a jewell.
From the wikipedia:
"The earliest known example of the Flower of Life symbol is possibly two and
a half thousand years old. Throughout human history, philosophers, artists,
and architects around the world have known the FOL for its perfect form,
proportion, and harmony. It is considered by many to be a symbol of sacred
geometry, said to contain ancient, religious value depicting the
fundamental forms of space and time. In this sense, it is a visual
expression of the connections life weaves through all mankind, believed by
some to contain a type of Akashic Record of basic information of all living
things."
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:46966c2b$2@news.povray.org...
>
>
>
> Ooooh, nice! You do know that it would be a helluva job for a jeweller
> to produce this? ;)
>
It is indeed very beautiful!
How would you tackle this Steve? Filigree?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote in message
news:46976b01@news.povray.org...
>
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:46966c2b$2@news.povray.org...
>>
>>
>>
>> Ooooh, nice! You do know that it would be a helluva job for a jeweller
>> to produce this? ;)
>>
>
> It is indeed very beautiful!
> How would you tackle this Steve? Filigree?
Hmm, I had to look at Txemi's first image to see what's involved. It
could be made the filigree way, but I think it would be faster to make it by
piercing the pattern out with a saw. You'd draw the pattern on a piece of
sheet silver, and then saw out all the bits that you don't need, leaving an
open lattice. With the settings, I'd make a model and get it cast to save
time. :)
~Steve~
>
> Thomas
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:4697772d@news.povray.org...
>
>
> Hmm, I had to look at Txemi's first image to see what's involved. It
> could be made the filigree way, but I think it would be faster to make it
> by piercing the pattern out with a saw. You'd draw the pattern on a piece
> of sheet silver, and then saw out all the bits that you don't need,
> leaving an open lattice. With the settings, I'd make a model and get it
> cast to save time. :)
>
I'm impressed. Something quite different from coding POV primitives ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The first pic was good, but this one beats it any day IMO. I particularly
like the color scheme. Are you using filter or transmit? And what about
photons?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote:
> I'm impressed. Something quite different from coding POV primitives ;-)
CSG, he uses the "difference" -method to cut out pieces of one big part.
Sorry I'm late, I hanged online behind GPRS for 2 months, so I have a
little catch-on to do.
> Thomas
>
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
