![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Here's a web page banner I'm posting in connection with a post I'm about to
make in the "general" newsgroup. Critiques welcome.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'astroquiz.jpg' (12 KB)
Preview of image 'astroquiz.jpg'
![astroquiz.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3Cweb.45b917ddcd47e2b11009749b0%40news.povray.org%3E/astroquiz.jpg?ttop=443866&toff=4050&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Hi Mike!
I'm not sure whether I like that perspective with respect to the planned
use as a banner. IMHO looking straight down onto the text would look
better. I'd probably even use an orthographic camera for such things,
although it kind of eliminates the 3D effect...
Regards,
Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Florian Brucker <tor### [at] torfbold com> wrote:
> Hi Mike!
>
> I'm not sure whether I like that perspective with respect to the planned
> use as a banner. IMHO looking straight down onto the text would look
> better. I'd probably even use an orthographic camera for such things,
> although it kind of eliminates the 3D effect...
>
>
> Regards,
> Florian
Yes, I know what you mean about the perspective. I was trying to show off
the soft shadows and it didn't look right from above. Maybe i'll lift the
letters off the plane a bit to see if that helps. Or, possibly stand the
letters up and view them from the front. I don't want to go totally
orthographic in this case, since I want to maintain the 3D look. I find
that setting the camera back and using a small camera angle helps keep it
looking "close" to orthographic but not quite (if that makes sense).
Thanks for the ideas,
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Mike Sobers" <sob### [at] mindspring com> wrote in message
news:web.45b98297f5b25ffebb1c02580@news.povray.org...
> Yes, I know what you mean about the perspective. I was trying to show off
> the soft shadows and it didn't look right from above. Maybe i'll lift the
> letters off the plane a bit to see if that helps. Or, possibly stand the
> letters up and view them from the front. I don't want to go totally
> orthographic in this case, since I want to maintain the 3D look. I find
> that setting the camera back and using a small camera angle helps keep it
> looking "close" to orthographic but not quite (if that makes sense).
I did some titles for a quicktime slideshow I was putting togeather. I found
that looking straight on, with the text just slightly raised above the plane
using an area_light off to the left looked quite nice .... give it a try!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Mike Sobers" <sob### [at] mindspring com> wrote:
> Yes, I know what you mean about the perspective. I was trying to show off
> the soft shadows and it didn't look right from above. Maybe i'll lift the
> letters off the plane a bit to see if that helps. Or, possibly stand the
> letters up and view them from the front. I don't want to go totally
> orthographic in this case, since I want to maintain the 3D look. I find
> that setting the camera back and using a small camera angle helps keep it
> looking "close" to orthographic but not quite (if that makes sense).
I too have been building web content for an overhaul of my website. My menu
/ banner objects are floating just above the page plane. I didn't want to
use an orthographic camera, so I've used quite a long-angle setting with
the vanishing point in the centre of a logo in the top left corner of my
page (the camera is in line with the logo object and the look_at point has
been shifted towards the bottom-right). I think this gives a nice 3D effect
whilst keeping a document-y feel.
Example here: http://www.infradead.org/~wmp/newhtml/ray_index.html
(there's no content yet, it's just a preliminary version to make sure my
includes and links were working).
I've lit the whole affair using pure radiosity because the area lights
weren't giving the effect I wanted.
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
To keep the 3d effect so prominent at a natural perspective, could it be
vertical along the side?
Florian Brucker wrote:
> Hi Mike!
>
> I'm not sure whether I like that perspective with respect to the planned
> use as a banner. IMHO looking straight down onto the text would look
> better. I'd probably even use an orthographic camera for such things,
> although it kind of eliminates the 3D effect...
>
>
> Regards,
> Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |