|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> >
> > "What would you do different with a clean slate to start over with?"
> >
> About the same...without humans :-)
>
Youre one of the robots from Futurama aren't you? :^)
> >
> > Rendered on forty (40) Pentium4 3GHZ CPU's (twenty dual-core machines)
> > over
> > the internet using my MegaPOV XRS tools :-). Render time: ~6.5hrs
> >
>
> Impressive to say the least!
>
Thanks, Thomas. I've been working hard (at both MegaPOV XRS and in getting
this landscape the way I wanted it to look) :)
George
http://www.gammaburst.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
JRG <j.g### [at] NOSPAMtiscaliit> wrote:
> George Pantazopoulos wrote:
>
> >
> > "What would you do different with a clean slate to start over with?"
> >
> >
> > Rendered on forty (40) Pentium4 3GHZ CPU's (twenty dual-core machines)
> > over the internet using my MegaPOV XRS tools :-). Render time: ~6.5hrs
> >
> > Command line:
> > +BS32 +w1600 +h800 +a0.025 +am2 +r3
>
> Wow.
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!
George
> Jonathan.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news: web.4507e9c6bf995f33c0bad8570@news.povray.org...
> I forgot to mention, this is using Jaime Vives Piqueres' excellent Project
> Tierra code. Thanks Jaime!
>
> George
That was my thought when I saw the foam lining following the shores :-)
And the clouds? pigment media or df3?
Excellent image!!
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
4507ed42$1@news.povray.org...
> > Rendered on forty (40) Pentium4 3GHZ CPU's (twenty dual-core machines)
over
> > the internet using my MegaPOV XRS tools :-). Render time: ~6.5hrs
>
> Wait, let me get this straight... You used TWENTY COMPUTERS, and it
> STILL took SIX HOURS??? o__O
Hi max_gradient low accuracy isosurface, lot of media and radiosity, what do
you expect else? :-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"George Pantazopoulos" <go### [at] tomyaboutpage> wrote in message
news:web.4507e8768bb092ec0bad8570@news.povray.org...
>
> "What would you do different with a clean slate to start over with?"
>
>
> Rendered on forty (40) Pentium4 3GHZ CPU's (twenty dual-core machines)
over
> the internet using my MegaPOV XRS tools :-). Render time: ~6.5hrs
>
> Command line:
> +BS32 +w1600 +h800 +a0.025 +am2 +r3
>
> Enjoy,
> George
>
> http://www.gammaburst.net
It's amazing looking, no doubt. However I think the white foam on the shores
is a little distracting. I think it looks best when it is very thing, like
on the larger body of water on the right, or on the water on the bottom
middle.
The subtle colors and shadows crossing the entire landscape are wonderful.
Who ever knew grey and brown could look so nice?
-r
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"George Pantazopoulos" <go### [at] tomyaboutpage> schreef in bericht
news:web.4507fe64bf995f33e4c60b4a0@news.povray.org...
>
>> >
>> > "What would you do different with a clean slate to start over with?"
>> >
>> About the same...without humans :-)
>>
>
> Youre one of the robots from Futurama aren't you? :^)
>
How did you guess?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote:
> > Youre one of the robots from Futurama aren't you? :^)
> How did you guess?
Render my shiny metal ass!
had to be done
B
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Breathtaking image. Its shortcomings are absolutely flattened by its visual
impact. Talk about broadening one's POV-Ray horizons! I find this sort of
thing a great inspiration.
Furthermore, the audacity of your CGI agriculture leaves me gasping for CPU
cycles! :-)
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow!! That's great. I find the foam a little out of place though.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ross wrote:
> The subtle colors and shadows crossing the entire landscape are wonderful.
> Who ever knew grey and brown could look so nice?
>
Braque/Picasso?
http://tinyurl.com/km42n
It is a beautiful render though.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |