 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks. Was my idea of a joke (one that took 5 1/2 hrs to render...)
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlink net> wrote in message
news:web.44e42b0c71ada4718ec41e640@news.povray.org...
> "Trevor G Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> Stefan Viljoen <spamnot@<removethis>polard.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Whiskey Oscar Wiskey...
>>
>> (neat)
>>
>
> Close enough to smell the aroma, yet...just...out...of...reach... :-(
>
> WOW is right! What a stunning image.
>
> Ken
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> THANKS so much for sharing the details. This kind of heightfield
> generation
> is new to me, too, and your lucid explanation is extremely helpful, far
> beyond the POV docs. Much appreciated!
>
> Ken W.
>
Thanks. I came across this capability a few years ago when I was meddling
with tileable patterns. I occasionally dig out the code when I see a need.
I find that they are much more convincing than surface normals (for some
reason they always seem flat to me) and far faster than isosurfaces.
However they are somewhat limited to flat surfaces.
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Any chance you could render this at a higher resolution so I can make it
my desktop image? ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v3" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:44e4ce52$1@news.povray.org...
> Any chance you could render this at a higher resolution so I can make it
> my desktop image? ;-)
when I get a chance, over the weekend maybe. What res?
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Any chance you could render this at a higher resolution so I can make it
>> my desktop image? ;-)
> when I get a chance, over the weekend maybe. What res?
*checks*
Hmm, my monitor is set to 1280x1024... one of those weird aspect ratios
that isn't 4:3.
How slow is it? Would 1600x1200 take too long?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'll run it, my laptop has the weekend off otherwise, so I have a good 60
hrs or so...
-tgq
"Orchid XP v3" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:44e607a3$1@news.povray.org...
>>> Any chance you could render this at a higher resolution so I can make it
>>> my desktop image? ;-)
>> when I get a chance, over the weekend maybe. What res?
>
> *checks*
>
> Hmm, my monitor is set to 1280x1024... one of those weird aspect ratios
> that isn't 4:3.
>
> How slow is it? Would 1600x1200 take too long?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >> Any chance you could render this at a higher resolution so I can make it
> >> my desktop image? ;-)
> > when I get a chance, over the weekend maybe. What res?
>
> *checks*
>
> Hmm, my monitor is set to 1280x1024... one of those weird aspect ratios
> that isn't 4:3.
>
> How slow is it? Would 1600x1200 take too long?
http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i52/barberofcivil/RSoCP2.jpg
1600x1200
14.5 hrs
focal blur, radiosity, photons, 256 light sources
it looks slightly different from the original, as that scene wasn't quite
intact anymore, so I tried to recreate somewhat.
Let me know if you can't get it off photobucket. The file is ~1.25MB so I
can't really post it here.
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> How slow is it? Would 1600x1200 take too long?
>
> http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i52/barberofcivil/RSoCP2.jpg
>
> 1600x1200
>
> 14.5 hrs
Ooo, ouch...
> focal blur, radiosity, photons, 256 light sources
Wow... that's a lotta lights.
> it looks slightly different from the original, as that scene wasn't quite
> intact anymore, so I tried to recreate somewhat.
Looks good to me.
> Let me know if you can't get it off photobucket. The file is ~1.25MB so I
> can't really post it here.
photobucked seems to have magically resized it to 400x300...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> > focal blur, radiosity, photons, 256 light sources
>
> Wow... that's a lotta lights.
>
HDRI based environment lighting macro I've been working on. (To be released
some time when I'm satisfied withit)
> photobucked seems to have magically resized it to 400x300...
Sorry, didn't notice that. I've posted it to my deviantART gallery.
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/38287071/
Hopefully this works for you.
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> focal blur, radiosity, photons, 256 light sources
>> Wow... that's a lotta lights.
>
> HDRI based environment lighting macro I've been working on. (To be released
> some time when I'm satisfied withit)
I see...
>> photobucked seems to have magically resized it to 400x300...
>
> Sorry, didn't notice that. I've posted it to my deviantART gallery.
>
> http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/38287071/
>
> Hopefully this works for you.
That works perfectly. Thanks!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
