 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:17:02 -0400, George Leroy Tirebiter wrote:
> aircraft it is?).
Excellent rendering; I was going to guess an F-4, but the layout's too
narrow for that. Still, it looks familiar...
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"George Leroy Tirebiter" <obd### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:web.447246084f52287c8bb8adf30@news.povray.org...
> This is the pilot's center instrument panel (does anyone else know what
> aircraft it is?).
SR-71 Blackbird. Not many planes carry RSOs. RIOs and WSOs are common, but
not "Reconnaissance Systems Officers".
- How
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:17:02 -0400, George Leroy Tirebiter wrote:
>
>> aircraft it is?).
>
> Excellent rendering; I was going to guess an F-4, but the layout's too
> narrow for that. Still, it looks familiar...
>
> Jim
I've seen the insides of an F-4 Sim. Your are right, not an F-4.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I don't know much about planes, but according to google it's definitely a
blackbird:
http://www.sr-71.org/blackbird/diagrams/cockpitdiagrams.php
Nice render :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jaap" <jws### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:web.44733d34a82834dfa8399d8d0@news.povray.org...
>I don't know much about planes, but according to google it's definitely a
> blackbird:
> http://www.sr-71.org/blackbird/diagrams/cockpitdiagrams.php
>
Ah, ya gotta love Google.
- How
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'sr-71-2-cockpit.jpg' (41 KB)
Preview of image 'sr-71-2-cockpit.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"How Camp" <hac### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Jaap" <jws### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
> news:web.44733d34a82834dfa8399d8d0@news.povray.org...
> >I don't know much about planes, but according to google it's definitely a
> > blackbird:
> > http://www.sr-71.org/blackbird/diagrams/cockpitdiagrams.php
> >
>
> Ah, ya gotta love Google.
>
> - How
How got it first- it's a SR-71. If I can get the textures to look half as
good as that photo, I'll be delighted.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"George Leroy Tirebiter" <obd### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.44737feea82834df8bb8adf30@news.povray.org...
>
> If I can get the textures to look half as
> good as that photo, I'll be delighted.
I think you've got an excellent handle on this so far. I appreciate the
accuracy!
I had fun with your image, by the way. I sent it to my old flight
instructor who guessed it to be an F-14 cockpit. Granted, he's ex-Army, so
what can you expect? One of the Air Force F-16 jocks in the building,
though, also guessed it as an F-14. :P
I really like your texture used on the drag chute handle. Is this
proceedural?
Also, I don't suppose any of the warning lights actually work? It would be
neat to see this lit up.
- How
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Most impressive!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"How Camp" <hac### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> One of the Air Force F-16 jocks in the building,
> though, also guessed it as an F-14. :P
>
It just goes to show that fighter jocks don't have to be aviation buffs.
However, the lack of electronic displays (that screen at the bottom is a
map projector) does suggest that it's a pre-'70s design.
> I really like your texture used on the drag chute handle. Is this
> proceedural?
>
unless it is absolutely necessary).
> Also, I don't suppose any of the warning lights actually work? It would be
> neat to see this lit up.
>
Funny you should mention this... I have been working on a lighted version.
It still needs a lot of work. The relative intensities of the lights need
to be adjusted, and I had to guess which gauges are backlit and which have
illuminated bezels.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ctr_pnl_illum.png' (187 KB)
Preview of image 'ctr_pnl_illum.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"George Leroy Tirebiter" <obd### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.4475e07fa82834df8bb8adf30@news.povray.org...
> Funny you should mention this... I have been working on a lighted version.
> It still needs a lot of work. The relative intensities of the lights need
> to be adjusted, and I had to guess which gauges are backlit and which have
> illuminated bezels.
Excellent! I am enjoying your images very much. Thanks for sharing!
- How
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
