"Budgery" <bud### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:web.40c8b2b5d6b07e93a1fd027f0@news.povray.org...
> "Shay" <rrr.rrr.r> wrote:
> > "Budgery" <bud### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
> > news:web.40c875bed6b07e93a1fd027f0@news.povray.org...
> >
> > Too messy now, IMO. Too much blur, and the second shape and out cutout
> > of the first detract from the best part of the picture, that part being
> > the texture on the cube sides.
>
> I agree to a certain extent.  I'm going to take out the smaller cube, and
> maybe tone down the blur a little bit...

I'm with Raf256... I like this one too. The sense of it dissolving yet
holding together, and the piece somehow cleanly removed while also looking
torn away. Only thing I didn't think at first was how the other cube might
be the missing corner section. I considered that to be a second whole or
partial cube in the background, so something about it didn't lead me to
believe it was falling away. I'd have thought them to be eventually
converging instead. Of course, you never said what it was doing anyhow.

It's a great 'conversation piece' type of rendering.

Bob H.

Post a reply to this message

Budgery nous apporta ses lumieres ainsi en ce 10/06/2004 15:12... :

>"Shay" <rrr.rrr.r> wrote:
>  
>
>>"Budgery" <bud### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
>>news:web.40c875bed6b07e93a1fd027f0@news.povray.org...
>>
>>Too messy now, IMO. Too much blur, and the second shape and out cutout
>>of the first detract from the best part of the picture, that part being
>>the texture on the cube sides.
>>
>> -Shay
>>    
>>
>
>I agree to a certain extent.  I'm going to take out the smaller cube, and
>maybe tone down the blur a little bit...but I'm definately going to keep
>the cut-out...I love that eerie blue glow on the chewy nougat center :)
>
>What do you think about the overall colors, though?  I didn't change them at
>all from the first image, but the blur really softens up that shadow, I
>think.
>
>Interesting trivia...that texture on the box you love so much (as do I) is
>really just a huge number of spheres (~35k) on spherical coordinates in the
>shape of a box, and not a box at all.
>
>Budge
>  
>
It was obvious that it was not a cube but a collection of spheres placed 
along a spherical pattern. At least, it was obvious for me in the first 
post...

Alain

Post a reply to this message

I prefered the first version : simplier, more effective !


Dark Skull Software
http://www.darkskull.net

A+

news:web.40c875bed6b07e93a1fd027f0@news.povray.org...
> "Budgery" <bud### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> > Thanks for all the input.  This is kind of a WIP.
> >
> > I was thinking of putting some focal blur on there, maybe try to make it
> > look like its microscopic, like a lattice of atoms or something.  I'll
play
> > around with it some more and see what happens.
>
> Updated version...
>
> http://filebox.vt.edu/users/rbudge/pics/povray/blurry_cube_1600x1200.jpg
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Post a reply to this message