POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : transition (44K) Server Time
4 Oct 2024 09:16:43 EDT (-0400)
  transition (44K) (Message 1 to 9 of 9)  
From: ABX
Subject: transition (44K)
Date: 9 Apr 1999 05:56:01
Message: <01be8266$bc640860$2b9ccdc3@wlodeks>
what you thinking about my image ?
-- 
Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba >>> wsk### [at] bmtcompl


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'abx.jpg' (45 KB)

Preview of image 'abx.jpg'
abx.jpg


 

From: Ken
Subject: Re: transition (44K)
Date: 9 Apr 1999 06:10:27
Message: <370DC2CF.F6293421@pacbell.net>
ABX wrote:
> 
> what you thinking about my image ?
> --
> Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba >>> wsk### [at] bmtcompl
> 
>  [Image]

 I think it is yellow. :)

 Actualy I like the concept of this and the modeling looks very good.
I think you need to lower the amount of focal blur as it looks like
it fades much too quickly at the center of the image. The text to the
right on the paper should be almost readable instead of completely
obscurred like it is now.

-- 
Ken Tyler

mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Bugs74
Subject: Re: transition (44K)
Date: 9 Apr 1999 07:23:25
Message: <370dd51d.0@news.povray.org>
Cool!


ABX heeft geschreven in bericht <01be8266$bc640860$2b9ccdc3@wlodeks>...
>what you thinking about my image ?
>--
>Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba >>> wsk### [at] bmtcompl
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Greg M  Johnson
Subject: Re: transition (44K)
Date: 9 Apr 1999 11:47:50
Message: <370E1271.19C85C52@geocities.com>
Wonderful concept, of a paper design being "rendered" into a real 3D
object.

Stylistically, though, simply decreasing the transparency isn't that
cool.  Why not have ABCD, where A is just paper, B is a wireframe, C is
blandly textured, etc?

Or,  how about making the pieces gradually being rendered line by line,
just like we see as we sit in front of our pov for hours on end!


ABX wrote:

> what you thinking about my image ?
> --
> Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba >>> wsk### [at] bmtcompl
>
>  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: transition (44K)
Date: 9 Apr 1999 14:38:18
Message: <370E3AEB.272192E1@aol.com>
Jpeg images don't like focal blur much apparently. Looks good, but the
out of focus does look extreme. But then that's probably a lot to do
with the "messy" quality focal blur does to an image if more than a bit
is applied. Were there a distant background completely fuzzed up this
would be different. That writing.. a drafting font? Or is it actually
handwritten? If so, you've been drafting too long :)


ABX wrote:
> 
> what you thinking about my image ?
> --
> Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba >>> wsk### [at] bmtcompl
> 
>  [Image]

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News


Post a reply to this message

From: Spider
Subject: Re: transition (44K)
Date: 9 Apr 1999 16:34:55
Message: <370DE531.F1D0B71C@bahnhof.se>
Now this is an interesting concept :-)
Good image and idea.
is it the Focal blur or the jpeg ? in any case, increase the quality a bit(too
blurred.)

ABX wrote:
> 
> what you thinking about my image ?
> --
> Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba >>> wsk### [at] bmtcompl
> 
>  [Image]

-- 
//Spider
        [ spi### [at] bahnhofse ]-[ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
What I can do and what I could do, I just don't know anymore
                "Marian"
        By: "Sisters Of Mercy"


Post a reply to this message

From: Johannes Hubert
Subject: Re: transition (44K)
Date: 10 Apr 1999 04:26:27
Message: <370efd23.0@news.povray.org>
I like the image and the concept!

But I too have to say: The focal blur is too extreme. Lowere it a bit...

Johannes.

ABX wrote in message <01be8266$bc640860$2b9ccdc3@wlodeks>...
>what you thinking about my image ?
>--
>Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba >>> wsk### [at] bmtcompl
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas Willhalm
Subject: Re: transition (44K)
Date: 12 Apr 1999 05:15:59
Message: <qqmwvzi1cg1.fsf@goldach.fmi.uni-konstanz.de>
"Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] geocitiescom> writes:

> Wonderful concept, of a paper design being "rendered" into a real 3D
> object.
> 
> Stylistically, though, simply decreasing the transparency isn't that
> cool.  Why not have ABCD, where A is just paper, B is a wireframe, C is
> blandly textured, etc?
> 
> Or,  how about making the pieces gradually being rendered line by line,
> just like we see as we sit in front of our pov for hours on end!

Or, let them "grow" like the walls of a house that is being built or
like sand/stones/soil that is put in a invisible container.

It is however already a very good image.

Thomas

-- 
http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm


Post a reply to this message

From: Andrew Woodfin
Subject: Re: transition (44K)
Date: 26 Apr 1999 18:11:51
Message: <3724D5C2.3E046F68@uncc.edu>
Nice. I agree with others that the blur is a little extreme. Also, maybe
a different transition implying some sort of growth from the paper
rather than appearing out of nothingness. Regardless, nice.

Andy

ABX wrote:

> what you thinking about my image ?
> --
> Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba >>> wsk### [at] bmtcompl
>
>  [Image]



--

--------------------
"There are three men in a boat with four cigarettes but no matches.
How do they smoke??"
  -The Riddler

Andrew Woodfin
UNC Charlotte Center for Precision Metrology
adw### [at] unccedu | http://www.coe.uncc.edu/~adwoodfi
--------------------


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.