|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Oldstench wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> The image nice-plug(in).jpg was taken from the rhino forum. It was modelled
> in Rhino and rendered in Flamingo. The image stolen_plug_idea.jpg is my
> version, modelled in Rhino, set up and textured in Moray, and rendered in
> POV. The models and positioning are obviously not going to be exact, there
> is also no focal blur. Now for what I need help with.
>
> [...]
Apart from the things already suggested (especially radiosity, reduced
ambient and reflection for the plastic), i would also consider blurred
relection.
In general when using a graphical modeller it often makes sense to do the
final tuning with a text editor in the povray source. You are not
restricted to the possibilities Moray supports then.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I fear it's a quite hard challenge. It's not so easy to take an image made
with a particular renderer and to reproduce it exactly with another one.
This Flamingo rendering is really photorealistic and I don't think POV
(which is a fantastic raytracer, but which has a quite simplified lighting
model) could make an image as good as that.
(I'm writing this so that someone, -Gilles, H.E.Day, Warp, Hormann & Co-,
pushed by his pride, will soon post stunning images showing that, once
again, POV is the winner and that Flamingo, Lightflow, Lightwave and all
that $oftwares suck).
//------------------------------
Call it POV-Pride.
JRG.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |