 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
should I change my stones macro ?
there are details important therefore
the big picture is via url
http://www.abx.art.pl/dom/projekt/ogrodzenie.jpg
instead small picture here
I'm sure you know who made tree macro :-)
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
No, the stones loook fine.
Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba wrote:
>
> should I change my stones macro ?
>
> there are details important therefore
> the big picture is via url
> http://www.abx.art.pl/dom/projekt/ogrodzenie.jpg
> instead small picture here
>
> I'm sure you know who made tree macro :-)
>
> ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Somehow the picture won't load... is it me, my connection or my browser
(IE5) or is it just bad luck????
Bugs74
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba wrote:
> should I change my stones macro ?
The stones look great, but the alignment is off.
With the grid type alignment of the stones, the walls and pillars are
structurally unsound, and can easily collapse. A staggered alignment,
like that seen in most brick walls would be more sound, and would look
more natural.
The walkway looks great as is!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I used IE to try and load the image at work, and it wouldn't. I came home
and used Netscape, and I got the image just fine. We can blame it on the
Microsoft application.
Bugs74 wrote:
> Somehow the picture won't load... is it me, my connection or my browser
> (IE5) or is it just bad luck????
>
> Bugs74
--
Samuel Benge
E-Mail: STB### [at] aol com
Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial:
http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"SamuelT." wrote:
> I used IE to try and load the image at work, and it wouldn't. I came home
> and used Netscape, and I got the image just fine. We can blame it on the
> Microsoft application.
Loads fine here, NS.
--
___ _______________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:58:03 -0500, David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet>
wrote:
>"SamuelT." wrote:
>
>> I used IE to try and load the image at work, and it wouldn't. I came home
>> and used Netscape, and I got the image just fine. We can blame it on the
>> Microsoft application.
>
>Loads fine here, NS.
The file is there but maybe something in the image makes it unreadable
by IE. I am using IE 5.5 and I can only see the image placeholder. IE
recognizes the dimensions of the image but not the filesize, so it
might be something in the server as well (incorrect context/type
header or something like that maybe?)
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
