POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3) Server Time
11 Aug 2024 19:36:23 EDT (-0400)
  Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3) (Message 1 to 10 of 10)  
From:
Subject: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3)
Date: 19 Feb 2004 17:14:20
Message: <noe.falzonPASDEPUB-191A09.23115419022004@news.povray.org>
Yes, it IS actually possible to make worse, but not with so much talent 
:D

It is a julia fractal, with a completely reflective surface, and a sky 
sphere with a simple black and withe pattern.

I wonder why I spent 3 hours of CPU time on that ;)


-- 
"Je ne deteste que les bourreaux" -- Albert Camus



Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'blah.jpg' (506 KB)

Preview of image 'blah.jpg'
blah.jpg


 

From:
Subject: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (2/3)
Date: 19 Feb 2004 17:14:44
Message: <noe.falzonPASDEPUB-429403.23121419022004@news.povray.org>


Post a reply to this message

From:
Subject: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (3/3)
Date: 19 Feb 2004 17:14:51
Message: <noe.falzonPASDEPUB-BDF7A8.23123919022004@news.povray.org>


Post a reply to this message

From: LightBeam
Subject: Re: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3)
Date: 19 Feb 2004 17:51:59
Message: <40353e0f@news.povray.org>
What did you do ? It is horrorfull ! ;-p


Post a reply to this message

From: Dan P
Subject: Re: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3)
Date: 19 Feb 2004 18:34:45
Message: <40354815$1@news.povray.org>
"LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscalifr> wrote in message
news:40353e0f@news.povray.org...
> What did you do ? It is horrorfull ! ;-p

It's... it's very modern... :-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Rafal 'Raf256' Maj
Subject: Re: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3)
Date: 19 Feb 2004 19:34:30
Message: <Xns9495FFECA257raf256com@203.29.75.35>
noe### [at] tiscalifr news:noe.falzonPASDEPUB-
191A09.23115419022004@news.povray.org

> Yes, it IS actually possible to make worse, but not with so much talent 

Yours message is unreadable, please cancel it and either compress and re-
send in some normal format, or maybe put in on some www

-- 
#macro g(U,V)(.4*abs(sin(9*sqrt(pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))))*pow(1-min(1,(sqrt(
pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))*.3)),2)+.9)#end#macro p(c)#if(c>1)#local l=mod(c,100
);g(2*div(l,10)-8,2*mod(l,10)-8)*p(div(c,100))#else 1#end#end light_source{
y 2}sphere{z*20 9pigment{function{p(26252423)*p(36455644)*p(66656463)}}}//M


Post a reply to this message

From: Andreas Kaiser
Subject: Re: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3)
Date: 19 Feb 2004 20:05:35
Message: <q6na30t9vcvtuad14ntusncrnr3e4hq88e@4ax.com>

<noe### [at] tiscalifr> wrote:

Uuh, ... no.
Looks like an ugly, broken b&w JPEG.


-- 
Andreas


Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3)
Date: 21 Feb 2004 16:51:04
Message: <4037d2c8@news.povray.org>
This article has the MIME type "message/partial", which KNode cannot handle
yet.
Meanwhile you can save the article as a text file and reassemble it by hand.

Please set your newsclient NOT to split messages over a certain size.
-- 
Rick

Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : (+44) 0845 1083740 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key : http://pgp.kitty5.com


Post a reply to this message

From: nospam
Subject: Re: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3) - julia_reflect_01.jpg (1/1)
Date: 23 Feb 2004 17:17:52
Message: <403a6762.6312644@localhost>
On ,  wrote:

>
>[Saved as file: C:\Program Files\Agent\blah.jpg]

Woa.  That is cool!

I tried to use the same technique and but all I got was this
(130k attachment).


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'julia_reflect_01.jpg' (129 KB)

Preview of image 'julia_reflect_01.jpg'
julia_reflect_01.jpg


 

From:
Subject: Re: Have you seen an uglier POV render ? :) - blah.jpg (1/3) - julia_reflect_01.jpg (1/1)
Date: 29 Feb 2004 12:33:37
Message: <noe.falzonPASDEPUB-1AE477.18311429022004@news.povray.org>
In article <403a6762.6312644@localhost>,
 Pet### [at] nymaliasnetalmost (nospam) wrote:

> I tried to use the same technique and but all I got was this
> (130k attachment).

Hey, I prefer yours than mine :)
We probably didn't use the same settings.


-- 
"Je ne deteste que les bourreaux" -- Albert Camus



Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.