 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hello,
from discussion with Mike in povray.newusers, here is my wip.
thanks again Mike
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'poulie.jpg' (51 KB)
Preview of image 'poulie.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stefan Viljoen
Subject: Re: isosurfaces problem (hello Mike) [50KB] - poulie.jpg (1/1)
Date: 27 Feb 2005 04:18:29
Message: <42219065@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The right honourable kurtz le pirate spake:
> hello,
>
> from discussion with Mike in povray.newusers, here is my wip.
> thanks again Mike
Interesting. What is it intended to be?
For me looks like a sports-car rim / fashion tyre. Could also be a type of
art-deco locomotive wheel?
--
---
Stefan Viljoen
Software Support Technician
Polar Design Solutions
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: isosurfaces problem (hello Mike) [50KB] - poulie.jpg (1/1)
Date: 27 Feb 2005 10:24:23
Message: <4221e627$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stefan Viljoen wrote:
> The right honourable kurtz le pirate spake:
>
>
>>hello,
>>
>>from discussion with Mike in povray.newusers, here is my wip.
>>thanks again Mike
>
>
> Interesting. What is it intended to be?
>
> For me looks like a sports-car rim / fashion tyre. Could also be a type of
> art-deco locomotive wheel?
>
Well it is winching cable of some sort. But the picture gives the
illusion that 3 pieces of cable are converging on one groove or sprocket
or what ever it would be called.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Alain
Subject: Re: isosurfaces problem (hello Mike) [50KB] - poulie.jpg (1/1)
Date: 27 Feb 2005 10:52:16
Message: <4221ecb0$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
kurtz le pirate nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2005-02-27 03:48:
> hello,
>
> from discussion with Mike in povray.newusers, here is my wip.
> thanks again Mike
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Now, it needs something to hold those puleys. The cables look good.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <4221ecb0$1@news.povray.org>,
Alain <ele### [at] netscape net> wrote:
>>kurtz le pirate nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2005-02-27 03:48:
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> from discussion with Mike in povray.newusers, here is my wip.
>>> thanks again Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>Now, it needs something to hold those puleys. The cables look good.
>>
>>Alain
yes of course ! this image is just for testing cables with isosurfaces
that i solved with help of mike...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Larry Hudson
Subject: Re: isosurfaces problem (hello Mike) [50KB] - poulie.jpg (1/1)
Date: 27 Feb 2005 18:43:13
Message: <42225b11@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
kurtz le pirate wrote:
> from discussion with Mike in povray.newusers, here is my wip.
> thanks again Mike
I'm puzzled... Not about your image, but with my viewing of it.
When I first viewed it within Thunderbird (vers 0.9 under Linux), it had
a *very* washed-out, grayish appearance -- almost a foggy monochrome.
But then I downloaded it and displayed it in GQview and the colors were
very sharp and distinct. (I often do this because it's then easy to
keep an image just a click away while reading the comments about it.)
I've never seen a difference like this with this same software before
(and believe me, the difference was *EXTREME*). I wondered if anyone
has a suggestion to explain what was going on. I'm also curious whether
anyone else using Thunderbird did or didn't see this same grayed-out
image I did.
Thanx -- Larry
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Alain
Subject: Re: isosurfaces problem (hello Mike) [50KB] - poulie.jpg (1/1)
Date: 27 Feb 2005 23:41:02
Message: <4222a0de$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Larry Hudson nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2005-02-27 18:43:
> I'm puzzled... Not about your image, but with my viewing of it.
>
> When I first viewed it within Thunderbird (vers 0.9 under Linux), it had
> a *very* washed-out, grayish appearance -- almost a foggy monochrome.
> But then I downloaded it and displayed it in GQview and the colors were
> very sharp and distinct. (I often do this because it's then easy to
> keep an image just a click away while reading the comments about it.)
> I've never seen a difference like this with this same software before
> (and believe me, the difference was *EXTREME*). I wondered if anyone
> has a suggestion to explain what was going on. I'm also curious whether
> anyone else using Thunderbird did or didn't see this same grayed-out
> image I did.
>
> Thanx -- Larry
No noticeable difference here. Using Mozilla thunderbird on W2K and IrfanView as
external viewer.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
