 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have slightly improved the modelling and added two more
patterns(patterns as in a specific fly, not a POV-Ray pattern. :-) )
The one on the left is an Adams(sometimes spelled Addams).
The center one is the Royal Wulff(sometimes spelled Wulf, this pattern
is also called the Royal Coachman quite often even though it doesn't
have the feather wings)
The one on the right is a Light Cahill.
The names for the patterns are a bit arbitrary, a single pattern may
have several different names from being developed in different areas,
but these names are pretty standard and recognizeable.
I am not satisfied with the bodies of the Adams and Light Cahill, in
real life they have a spun fur body, these look like plastic foam. And
the textures need adjustment, the Light Cahill should have a light cream
body.
The Adams has feather-tip wings, I wrote a macro to construct them,
complete with the spine of the feather and the fibers. It is a bit more
memory consuming, but I couldn't find any more realistic way of doing it.
JPEG is already killing it, but I didn't want to upload a larger file
here. I will put a higher quality version on my web site when I get the
time. This will probably be my last fly image posted until I get an
actual scene(a fly box and some other fishing equipment, maybe I will
model my fly tying desk).
--
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoo com
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Flies.jpg' (49 KB)
Preview of image 'Flies.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Peter Warren
Subject: Re: More Flies(about 70KB) - Flies.jpg (1/1)
Date: 8 Jan 2000 05:20:08
Message: <38770f58@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I noticed this in an earlier version but now it is more pronounced.
The shadows strike me as off.
I don't know how many light sources your using but maybe
shadowless for one would work.
Nice image, nonetheless.
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> here. I will put a higher quality version on my web site when I get the
> time. This will probably be my last fly image posted until I get an
> actual scene(a fly box and some other fishing equipment, maybe I will
> model my fly tying desk).
This is geat! Can't wait to see these in a box.
How do you make the white fluff on the Royal Wulff?
sig.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <38770f58@news.povray.org>, "Peter Warren"
<int### [at] halcyoncom> wrote:
> I noticed this in an earlier version but now it is more pronounced.
> The shadows strike me as off.
> I don't know how many light sources your using but maybe
> shadowless for one would work.
I am using two light sources, one is half the intensity of the other. I
wasn't really concerned with the shadows in this image, I was just
working on the modelling.
--
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <38771C84.C401E8E2@stud.ntnu.no>, Sigmund Kyrre Aas
<as### [at] studntnuno> wrote:
> This is geat! Can't wait to see these in a box.
I have a simple fly box almost done, and a couple flies in it.
> How do you make the white fluff on the Royal Wulff?
I made a macro which makes each fiber from cylinders and spheres(to
smooth the joints), and a cylinder at the end of each fiber.
--
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
They make really nice shadows.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
3:21am up 6 days, 1:55, 5 users, load average: 1.41, 1.60, 1.61
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
