POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Electrical schematics include - Multivibrator.png (1/1) Server Time
19 Aug 2024 06:22:09 EDT (-0400)
  Electrical schematics include - Multivibrator.png (1/1) (Message 21 to 23 of 23)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: Electrical schematics include - Multivibrator.png (1/1)
Date: 2 Mar 2001 16:36:58
Message: <chrishuff-EBF64F.16351802032001@news.povray.org>
In article <3a9fa610@news.povray.org>, "Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg> 
wrote:

> No, I was suggesting how you could do the traces, using boxes and splines
> broken down into linear segments... or am I totally lost?

You've certainly lost me...making the traces isn't the problem, the 
problem is positioning the traces so they don't intersect or contact, 
and positioning the components to fit on the board. I can probably make 
a different mode for the include file that will do all this, putting the 
traces on one side of the board with jumpers to cross over and using 
models of actual components, but schematics will likely require manual 
adjustment because the positioning of the component model terminals will 
be different from the symbol terminals.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><


Post a reply to this message

From: Tony[B]
Subject: Re: Electrical schematics include - Multivibrator.png (1/1)
Date: 2 Mar 2001 20:40:03
Message: <3aa04b73@news.povray.org>
>the problem is positioning the traces
>so they don't intersect or contact,

Shouldn't that be the job of the user? Just give 'em a macro that makes the
traces and let them worry about them interesecting or not.


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: Electrical schematics include - Multivibrator.png (1/1)
Date: 3 Mar 2001 12:21:30
Message: <chrishuff-5BF8D1.12190403032001@news.povray.org>
In article <3aa04b73@news.povray.org>, "Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg> 
wrote:

> Shouldn't that be the job of the user?

Not when the whole point of the feature is that the user doesn't have to 
do it...


> Just give 'em a macro that makes the traces and let them worry about 
> them interesecting or not.

That's currently all that exists.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.