|
|
In article <3a9fa610@news.povray.org>, "Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg>
wrote:
> No, I was suggesting how you could do the traces, using boxes and splines
> broken down into linear segments... or am I totally lost?
You've certainly lost me...making the traces isn't the problem, the
problem is positioning the traces so they don't intersect or contact,
and positioning the components to fit on the board. I can probably make
a different mode for the include file that will do all this, putting the
traces on one side of the board with jumpers to cross over and using
models of actual components, but schematics will likely require manual
adjustment because the positioning of the component model terminals will
be different from the symbol terminals.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
In article <3aa04b73@news.povray.org>, "Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg>
wrote:
> Shouldn't that be the job of the user?
Not when the whole point of the feature is that the user doesn't have to
do it...
> Just give 'em a macro that makes the traces and let them worry about
> them interesecting or not.
That's currently all that exists.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|