 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Micha Riser
Subject: Re: texture bluring v 0.55 WIP - 2 attachments - 2 attachments
Date: 20 Jul 2002 09:46:39
Message: <3d3969bf@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> This is a MIME-encoded message.
> --==_=_====____37457,59353726859AAB401E==
>
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de> wrote in
> news:3D395455.FA5CBB03@gmx.de
>
>>>
>>> begin 644 2002_07_15_textblur_0smpl.tif
>>> M24DJ`!X\`0!XG.W!`0T```#"H/=/;0\'%``````````/!AX```%XG.W!`0T`
>>> [...]
>> It should be noted your attachments appear inline here.
>
> in XNews it looks o.k. - how about other news-clients ?
>
> and how about now ? I selected [x] Use MIME in XNews, did it help ?
>
Nope. Still inline here (KNode 0.6.1).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Micha Riser <mri### [at] gmxnet> wrote in news:3d3969bf@news.povray.org
>> and how about now ? I selected [x] Use MIME in XNews, did it help ?
> Nope. Still inline here (KNode 0.6.1).
now... ? should I use yEnc, MIME, or neither ? Maybe I should change
something in headers ? I turned off Content-Type and Mime-Verison this
time.
btw. Is there some special news-client for POV ? What for is
X-POV-Header: --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Rafal 'Raf256' Maj
Subject: Re: texture bluring v 0.55 WIP - 2 attachments - 2 attachments - File 1 of 2 - 2002_07_15_textblur_6smpl.tif (1/1)
Date: 20 Jul 2002 10:35:59
Message: <Xns9251A84347098raf256com@204.213.191.226>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '2002_07_15_textblur_6smpl.tif.dat' (86 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Rafal 'Raf256' Maj
Subject: Re: texture bluring v 0.55 WIP - 2 attachments - 2 attachments - File 2 of 2 - 2002_07_15_textblur_0smpl.tif (1/1)
Date: 20 Jul 2002 10:36:05
Message: <Xns9251A847DE7E8raf256com@204.213.191.226>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '2002_07_15_textblur_0smpl.tif.dat' (80 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wasn't it Rafal 'Raf256' Maj who wrote:
>in XNews it looks o.k. - how about other news-clients ?
>
>and how about now ? I selected [x] Use MIME in XNews, did it help ?
>
My newsreaded could decode the files in the first posting but not the
second one. Unfortunately you chose to use a rather non-standard TIF
compression format, and I don't seem to have anything that can display
the contents of such files. Is there any reason why you can't use a more
standard format like JPEG?
--
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Micha Riser
Subject: Re: texture bluring v 0.55 WIP - 2 attachments - 2 attachments
Date: 20 Jul 2002 10:54:50
Message: <3d3979b9@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> Micha Riser <mri### [at] gmxnet> wrote in news:3d3969bf@news.povray.org
>
>>> and how about now ? I selected [x] Use MIME in XNews, did it help ?
>> Nope. Still inline here (KNode 0.6.1).
>
> now... ?
No :( Still not good. It shows now as attachments but when I save them the
files don't get unencoded. Unfortunately I cannot tell you what
respectively why it is going wrong. The webinterface does not have problems
with the attachments though.
> btw. Is there some special news-client for POV ? What for is
> X-POV-Header: --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
> ?
No, there is no special news-client. I guess the 'X-POV-Header' line is
just some stripline.
- Micha
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Williams <mik### [at] econymdemoncouk> wrote in
news:B0mLQAAnNWO9Ew+W### [at] econymdemoncouk
> My newsreaded could decode the files in the first posting but not the
> second one. Unfortunately you chose to use a rather non-standard TIF
> compression format, and I don't seem to have anything that can display
> the contents of such files. Is there any reason why you can't use a more
> standard format like JPEG?
JPEG is poor for "computer-generated" images (with clear, light color),
eaven at 95 quality still artefacts are very visible. Asecialy in non-
blured sphere - the border around red checker is blured and have dark-red
sourounding
another try (8bit, MIME 1, MIME)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '2002_07_15_textblur_6smpl.jpg' (14 KB)
Download '2002_07_15_textblur_0smpl.jpg' (21 KB)
Preview of image '2002_07_15_textblur_6smpl.jpg'
Preview of image '2002_07_15_textblur_0smpl.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Micha Riser
Subject: Re: texture bluring v 0.55 WIP - 2 attachments - 2 attachments - 2 attachments
Date: 20 Jul 2002 10:59:49
Message: <3d397ae5@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Now it worked! Shows even up inline in my newsreader.
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> JPEG is poor for "computer-generated" images (with clear, light color),
> eaven at 95 quality still artefacts are very visible. Asecialy in non-
> blured sphere - the border around red checker is blured and have dark-red
> sourounding
I cannot see any artifacts without zooming in. If you really need an
alternative to jpeg I would suggest png which is wider spread in the web
than tiff.
- Micha
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: texture bluring v 0.55 WIP - 2 attachments - 2 attachments - 2 attachments
Date: 20 Jul 2002 11:08:55
Message: <3D397D07.D39A484C@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This worked.
The blur method used seems to be similar to the one i used in Megapov
MCP. It's probably also at least as slow as there... ;-)
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 15 Jul. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in
news:3D397D07.D39A484C@gmx.de
> This worked.
yupe ;)
> The blur method used seems to be similar to the one i used in Megapov
> MCP. It's probably also at least as slow as there... ;-)
probalby slower, but it works on pure Pov 3.5
--
> A jedyne co czytam, ze to terrorysci internetowi z echelonu planuja
> kolejny atak na centrale TPSA
- Expert vel Jacek (obecnie gol### [at] pocztaonetpl)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
