Here it is again. I consider it as final unless you find major bugs in it.
I could not realize many of your suggestions (and some I could not even
try), but anybody who commented on the earlier versions really helped me a
lot. It made a lacking scene much better.

I want to thank Alf Peake again for posting the fibonacci code, Christophe


What do you think about it now?

Marc-Hendrik

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'verwaltung - final.jpg' (83 KB)

Preview of image 'verwaltung - final.jpg'

The light could be a bit brighter, but otherwise, this is one excellent
render! Uh, also, did you use radiosity or did you fake it? It seems to me
that the normal shouldn't disappear so much because of the shadow of the
bucket.

Post a reply to this message

In article <3aa15128@news.povray.org>, Marc-Hendrik Bremer says...
> Here it is again. I consider it as final unless you find major bugs in it.
> I could not realize many of your suggestions (and some I could not even
> try), but anybody who commented on the earlier versions really helped me a
> lot. It made a lacking scene much better.
> 
> I want to thank Alf Peake again for posting the fibonacci code, Christophe

> 
> What do you think about it now?
> 
> Marc-Hendrik

I like the scene very much. To my taste the whole image is on the dark 
side and increasing the contrast (with PhotoShop e.g.) does it a lot of 
good. Unless of course you wanted it to be in 'dark' light..? :)
-- 
Regards,  Sander

Post a reply to this message

Very impressive!

"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:3aa15128@news.povray.org...
> Here it is again. I consider it as final unless you find major bugs in it.
> I could not realize many of your suggestions (and some I could not even
> try), but anybody who commented on the earlier versions really helped me a
> lot. It made a lacking scene much better.
>
> I want to thank Alf Peake again for posting the fibonacci code, Christophe

>
> What do you think about it now?
>
> Marc-Hendrik
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
> 
> Here it is again. I consider it as final unless you find major bugs in it.
> I could not realize many of your suggestions (and some I could not even
> try), but anybody who commented on the earlier versions really helped me a
> lot. It made a lacking scene much better.
> 
> I want to thank Alf Peake again for posting the fibonacci code, Christophe

> 
> What do you think about it now?
> 

Turned out very well, maybe somewhat dark, making the light source a
little brighter could help.

A larger version would be great too.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message

Nice revisions.  The birds were exactly what you needed to liven it up a
little.  The broom and the hay wagon are great too.  The brightness is
alright on my monitor, but I have my monitor set really bright all the time.
My advice to you now is to load it up on a few other computers to see how
others see it.  You brightened up the scene with a bit more yellow light,
didn't you?  Whatever you did to the light source, I can tell a difference
now (especially on the well).  Anyway, good job.  Just watch the gamma for
people on darker computers.

Stephen Bell

"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:3aa15128@news.povray.org...
> Here it is again. I consider it as final unless you find major bugs in it.
> I could not realize many of your suggestions (and some I could not even
> try), but anybody who commented on the earlier versions really helped me a
> lot. It made a lacking scene much better.
>
> I want to thank Alf Peake again for posting the fibonacci code, Christophe

>
> What do you think about it now?
>
> Marc-Hendrik
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Stephen Bell schrieb in Nachricht <3aa16c07@news.povray.org>...
>Nice revisions.

Thanks.

>The birds were exactly what you needed to liven it up a
>little.  The broom and the hay wagon are great too.  The brightness is
>alright on my monitor, but I have my monitor set really bright all the
time.

Well, I just made a small test render with the light intensity increased by
50% and it came out much "sunnier" I'll make a better quality version
tommorow and decide afterwards.

>My advice to you now is to load it up on a few other computers to see how
>others see it.  You brightened up the scene with a bit more yellow light,
>didn't you?  Whatever you did to the light source, I can tell a difference
>now (especially on the well).

Yes I removed <1,1,0.8> by <1.1,1.1,0.7>.

>Anyway, good job.  Just watch the gamma for
>people on darker computers.

Yeah, I should have thought about it earlier. I render always at
assumed_gama 1 with a display_gamma of 1.6. That's probably what causes all
this trouble, I think.

Marc-Hendrik

Post a reply to this message

Christoph Hormann schrieb in Nachricht <3AA16A0F.6E8EE047@gmx.de>...
>
>Turned out very well, maybe somewhat dark, making the light source a
>little brighter could help.
>

I'll try a version with 50% brighter light_source tomorrow

>A larger version would be great too.
>

I'm planning a 1024x768 version for printing (and perhaps as my
windows-wallpaper).

Marc-Hendrik

Post a reply to this message

Tony[B] schrieb in Nachricht <3aa15c8d@news.povray.org>...
>The light could be a bit brighter, but otherwise, this is one excellent
>render!

Thanks! I'll try a brigther version tommorow.

>Uh, also, did you use radiosity or did you fake it? It seems to me
>that the normal shouldn't disappear so much because of the shadow of the
>bucket.

It is radiosity but not a normal. It's a granite pigment function on an
Isosurface. I think it vanishes because it's not that deep.

Marc-Hendrik

Post a reply to this message

Dave Blandston schrieb in Nachricht <3aa16652@news.povray.org>...
>Very impressive!


Thank you!

Marc-Hendrik

Post a reply to this message