 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yip, that's the name of this nifty new art.
Here are two stereopovographic images (love that word ;). They are not
much really, just an experiment.
To view these images, see previous message about 3d sabers.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'mose3d2.jpg' (20 KB)
Preview of image 'mose3d2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'mose3d2.jpg' (0 KB)
Download 'mose3d.jpg' (17 KB)
Preview of image 'mose3d.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like them however the rows of columns actually messes up the 3D effect
instead of enhancing it. At least for me it does.
Noam Lewis wrote:
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
>
> I like them however the rows of columns actually messes up the 3D effect
> instead of enhancing it. At least for me it does.
yeah, it does for me also. I think it looks pretty cool though.
Kyle
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
BTW. I made a stereo viewer that works OK.
<p>I took a cheap pair of opera glasses and removed the lenses that are
usually closest to my eyes. The lenses on the front made an excellent
stereo viewer.
<br>
<br>
<p>Kyle wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Thomas Lake wrote:
<br>>
<br>> I like them however the rows of columns actually messes up the 3D
effect
<br>> instead of enhancing it. At least for me it does.
<p>yeah, it does for me also. I think it looks pretty cool though.
<p> Kyle</blockquote>
<p>--
<br>Bryan Valencia
<br>Software Services
<br><A HREF="http://www.209software.com">http://www.209software.com</A>
<br><A HREF="mailto:bry### [at] 209software com">mailto:bry### [at] 209softwarecom</A>
<p>- "the gravest lie about Y2K matters, is that your company can, through
the acquisition of
<br>affidavits of compliance, protect itself against harm, whether real
or litigated. It can't.
<br>This faith in legal documents is hollow and in fact dangerous. The
wisest course of action
<br>is for you to immediately disabuse yourself of this deceit."
<p>- <A
HREF="http://language.perl.com/news/y2k.html">http://language.perl.com/news/y2k.html</A>
<br> </html>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
These images have extreme depth, which is why the columns probably throw
people off. I've done images with objects in near foreground and distant
background before and what happens is you need to focus on the near or
far (or middle) distance only and look from near to far. It can be
annoying to do because the other objects never disappear of course, only
become out of range. Same thing goes for real vision of true 3D world
stuff but for some reason this is very obvious in flat images that are
faking 3D depth of field.
Personally I would say you have a bit too much separation in the camera
positions left to right as well however.
An open space scene is going to be harder to control than a closed room
scene for example too. The size of the "subject" objects should always
be considered as well, though you could do a stereopair view of a
mountain it wouldn't be very right to see it as if you were 600 feet
tall instead of 6 ft. I've done outdoor photos in 3D before however of
bridges and the like that did this to get them seen as whole 3
dimensional structures, as if they were scaled models, otherwise they
are too flat. So it really depends on what your after.
Noam Lewis wrote:
>
> [Image]
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
ditch the pillars man
<p>Noam Lewis wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> [Image]</blockquote>
</html>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
