On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:30:20 -0600, Dan Byers wrote:

> ... a Splork pict gone awry... I personally am none too happy with it :(
> but I figure maybe someone else might see something good about it... blah..
> 
> 
> ----------
> dan
> Goofy Graffix - http://hometown.aol.com/goofygrafx
> DanByersArt - http://www.huntel.net/goofygraffix
> 
>

It looks good except for maybe some texturing issues. I think the shinier 
look of your earlier splorks have a nicer effect. Maybe some radiosity 
could save this image...

-- 
light_source#macro G(E)sphere{z+E*y*5e-3.04rotate-z*E*6pigment{rgbt#end{
20*y-10#local n=162;1}#while(n)#local n=n-.3;G(n)x}}G(-n).7}}#end//GregE

Post a reply to this message

Well... maybe it's not the coolest thing I've ever seen... but it's
definitely not half bad! I actually kinda like it myself...

Andrew.

Post a reply to this message

in article 3e6f4bbb@news.povray.org, Hugo Asm at hua### [at] post3teledk wrote on
3/12/03 9:01 AM:

>> I think I tend to do better when I just pick a
>> direction and let things happen; much more
>> chaotic and happenstance, which I think is
>> a quality of all good art :)
> 
> I think I understand. But does it mean the results are better, or does it
> mean, you just like them more because they don't have to live up to your
> vision?
> 
> :o)
> Regards,
> Hugo
> 
> 

Let's just say I prefer my relationship with POV to be on the casual dating
side - you know, we get together every now and then, hang out, have a good
time, drink a little  wine, maybe even get laid, and everybody goes home
happy and carefree... it's when it becomes a "serious" relationship that all
the headaches (and heartaches) start!  ;)

----------
dan
Goofy Graffix - http://hometown.aol.com/goofygrafx
DanByersArt - http://www.huntel.net/goofygraffix

Post a reply to this message