 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
... once again bored. GraphicConverter for Mac sucks; you can't see some of
the detail from the reflections... oh, well. Enjoy :)
----------
dan
Goofy Graffix - http://hometown.aol.com/goofygrafx
DanByersArt - http://www.huntel.net/goofygraffix
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'thing.jpg' (61 KB)
Preview of image 'thing.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like the brownish part at the upper part of the picture very much! It
resembles a high altiture photograph of a planet. How did you do that part?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dan, Abstract wonderfulness! I like it. The bubble cast shadows bind the layers
in the image together.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Apache wrote:
>I like the brownish part at the upper part of the picture very much! It
>resembles a high altiture photograph of a planet. How did you do that part?
>
it's a height_field; I used POV to generate a layered texture on a plane
(bozo and granite, I think - it was randomly generated) and that was the
source image...
I did it using the MegaPOV 1.0 for DOS on my computer at work, but so far
I've been unable to duplicate it on my Mac at home :(
----------------------
dan
Goofy Graffix - http://hometown.aol.com/goofygrafx
DanByersArt - http://www.huntel.net/goofygraffix
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
William F. Pokorny wrote:
>Dan, Abstract wonderfulness! I like it. The bubble cast shadows bind the layers
>in the image together.
>
thanks for the compliment! the bubbles are randomly generated along
several spline paths :)
----------------------
dan
Goofy Graffix - http://hometown.aol.com/goofygrafx
DanByersArt - http://www.huntel.net/goofygraffix
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dan Byers wrote:
> ... once again bored. GraphicConverter for Mac sucks; you can't see some of
> the detail from the reflections... oh, well. Enjoy :)
It sucks as an editor, but it makes a pretty good file reader/converter.
The best JPEG compressor I know of for the Mac is a little cjpeg port
called "To JPEG". It's old and there's no OS X version (though it runs
just fine under Classic), but with the chroma downsampling turned off it
produces very nice images at reasonable file sizes, and vice-versa.
(I'm assuming that you're complaining about JPEG artifacts/blurriness,
as there seems to be a lot of it in your pic, and I can't think of
anything else in GraphicConverter that would eliminate detail...)
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <BA4E3F0B.2343%goo### [at] huntel net>,
Dan Byers <goo### [at] huntelnet> wrote:
> ... once again bored. GraphicConverter for Mac sucks; you can't see some of
> the detail from the reflections... oh, well. Enjoy :)
That's JPEG, blaming it on GraphicConverter is just silly. In my
experience, GraphicConverter is a very good way to create JPEG versions
of an image. First, you could probably improve the results just by using
different settings, but images with contrasting colors like this will
never compress well with JPEG.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey, I like it!
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
