 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"m@b" <sai### [at] googlemail com> wrote:
> >>
> >> https://boneyard.pythonanywhere.com/360/360.htm
> >>
> >
> > At that webpage, all I see is a blank white screen :-(
> >
> > [Running latest Firefox in Windows]
> >
> You might have to give it a minute or two - It's a large .png file.
>
Yes, that worked! "Patience is a virtue", ha.
The odd thing is that Firefox's little 'file loading' indicator reports almost
instantly that the file *has* completely loaded-- but the screen stays white for
a couple of minutes until the 360-image appears. That's an *extremely* long time
for Firefox to be processing or assembling(?) the visual result...if that is
what is happening...especially in my super-fast Win 10 machine. Very strange!
Anyway, the result looks great; thanks for sharing.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 19.11.2021 um 08:16 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> Op 13/11/2021 om 08:10 schreef m@b:
>>
>> https://boneyard.pythonanywhere.com/360/360.htm
>>
>> Original images from here:
>> https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/solid-objects
>>
>
> I forgot to comment. (1) I do not have the loading problem mentioned by
> others. It opened within a couple of seconds. (2) Again, an intriguing
> discovery of ancient texts/illustrations. Well done indeed. I guess some
> of them were harder to model than others, the lute for example.
>
Maybe the delay depends on the browser used. Edge opend the link within
the part of a second (but not immediately). Maybe Chrome shows a
similiar behaviour since it is related to Edge. To model historic
drawings is an interesting task and you did a nice job here. I ever
thought to model an old painting like the Capriccio project years ago.
But my interest is more on old roman frescos or on images by my favorite
late medieval painter, Pieter Bruegel the Elder.
Best regards,
Michael
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Op 06/12/2021 om 10:56 schreef Kenneth:
> Yes, that worked! "Patience is a virtue", ha.
>
> The odd thing is that Firefox's little 'file loading' indicator reports almost
> instantly that the file *has* completely loaded-- but the screen stays white for
> a couple of minutes until the 360-image appears. That's an *extremely* long time
> for Firefox to be processing or assembling(?) the visual result...if that is
> what is happening...especially in my super-fast Win 10 machine. Very strange!
>
Just guessing, but maybe it is not the machine which delays the visual
result, but simply the download/communication speed of your modem. In
this country (NL), you buy the upload/download speed package that you
think you may need, from the provider (faster = more money).
Additionally, the medium through which the info travels (here it is
mostly cable; before it was dsl; and now we are gradually switching to
fibreglass country-wide). Probably identical on your side of the
'sundering seas'...
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Op 06/12/2021 om 10:56 schreef Kenneth:
> > That's an *extremely* long time
> > for Firefox to be processing or assembling(?) the visual result...if that is
> > what is happening...especially in my super-fast Win 10 machine.
> >
>
> Just guessing, but maybe it is not the machine which delays the visual
> result, but simply the download/communication speed of your modem.
Mine is quite fast, usually; it's high-speed 'broadband' through fibre-optic
cable. I guess the OP's file must be *really* big!
I also tried Microsoft's Edge browser: same white-screen delay. But at least it
indicates that the file *is* still loading, unlike Firefox.
BTW, I probably exaggerated the time delay; it's actually only about 45 sec
until the 360-image appears.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Mine is quite fast, usually; it's high-speed 'broadband' through fibre-optic
> cable. I guess the OP's file must be *really* big!
I have DSL, and using brave browser on my Alienware 17 R3 (*)
it loads and renders very quickly, with only a very slight delay.
(*)
CPU:
Topology: Quad Core model: Intel Core i7-6700HQ bits: 64 type: MT MCP
arch: Skylake-S rev: 3 L2 cache: 6144 KiB
flags: avx avx2 lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx
bogomips: 41599
Speed: 900 MHz min/max: 800/3500 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 900 2: 900
3: 900 4: 900 5: 900 6: 900 7: 900 8: 900
Graphics:
Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 530 vendor: Dell driver: i915 v: kernel
bus ID: 00:02.0
Device-2: NVIDIA GM204M [GeForce GTX 970M] vendor: Dell driver: nvidia
v: 390.144 bus ID: 01:00.0
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.11 driver: modesetting,nvidia
unloaded: fbdev,nouveau,vesa resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GTX 970M/PCIe/SSE2 v: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 390.144
direct render: Yes
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>
> I have DSL, and using brave browser on my Alienware 17 R3 (*)
> it loads and renders very quickly, with only a very slight delay.
>
> (*)
> CPU:
> Topology: Quad Core model: Intel Core i7-6700HQ bits: 64 type...
I guess mine is similar, and probably even faster::
Intel Core i7-10700 CPU at 2.90GHZ (8 cores/16 threads)
16 GB ram
Hmm, this gets "curious-er and curious-er".
Methinks there are data-transmission bottlenecks somewhere, affecting some of us
but not all. That stuff is black magic to me.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
