 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Harold
Subject: Re: 'Cubic Space Division' anaglyphic 3D (for red and green glasses)[193 KB JPG]
Date: 18 Nov 2003 17:31:25
Message: <3fba9dbd$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Erhard Ducke" <duc### [at] gentlemansclub de> wrote
> Perspective seems to be a bit exxagerated so the lenses have more
> distance than (my) eyes to give a greater effect?!
The camera I use most is a FED Stereo, they were made in
Ukraine in the late 1980's. Not very reliable, but it has autoexposure.
The FED has a normal 62mm (65mm?) stereo separation.
On some shots I use a pair of twinned (synchronized) Pentax ZX-Ms,
the stereo base on those is a 6 inch minimum. The shots of the
man burning have a 10 inch stereo base.
> From this
> time I have no difficulties watching your parallel view pictures. Most
> people I know cannot see the effect without training.
> Finding the solution for these
> original-and-falsification-riddle-pictures (don't know how they are
> called in English) is very easy using this special kind of view ;-)
Here in the USA we call those "Magic Eye" or "Hidden Image"
stereograms. Originally they were called Random Dot Stereograms (RDS).
They are a good way to learn to "free view" (no glasses or viewer used).
I find it easier to use the cross eye method, but most people don't
Cheers,
Harolddd
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Harold
Subject: Re: 'Cubic Space Division' anaglyphic 3D (for red and green glasses)[193 KB JPG]
Date: 18 Nov 2003 17:33:46
Message: <3fba9e4a$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Erhard,
You should try this free program for working with
stereo images:
http://www3.zero.ad.jp/esuto/
Makes it very easy to make anaglyphs.
Harolddd
"Erhard Ducke" <duc### [at] gentlemansclubde> wrote in message
news:5m2lrvs4jhkmlovdro9cmburubk5iburdi@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:48:26 -0800, "Harold" <bai### [at] 3dculturecom>
> wrote:
>
> >Nice subject for stereoscopic anaglyph.
> >How did you make it?
>
> Quick and dirty: For the right view I colored light and fog blue and
> for the left one red (after appropriate translation of the cam), the I
> added the two pictures in my photo editor choosing the 'exclusion'
> method for combining the layers...
> If you are interested:
> Look for 'Cubic Space Division' thread in the povray animation group,
> I posted a divx avi file there. If you turn on the repeat or loop
> function of your media player you can make a infinite journey through
> the 'cubic space' ...
>
> --
> Erhard Ducke
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:32:23 -0800, "Harold" <bai### [at] 3dculturecom>
wrote:
>Here in the USA we call those "Magic Eye" or "Hidden Image"
>stereograms. Originally they were called Random Dot Stereograms (RDS).
>They are a good way to learn to "free view" (no glasses or viewer used).
>I find it easier to use the cross eye method, but most people don't
No, I mean those pictures that are often printed in magazines. Mostly
they consist of two separate pictures, e.g. classical paintings. One
is the original and on the other one there are some parts of the
original modified. When you watch the two pictures you have to search
for the modified places, when you look 'parallel' to them like you do
with stereoscopic photos you see the difference much faster...
--
Erhard Ducke
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Harold
Subject: Re: 'Cubic Space Division' anaglyphic 3D (for red and green glasses)[193 KB JPG]
Date: 18 Nov 2003 19:39:49
Message: <3fbabbd5$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ohhhh.... those. Yeah. free viewing them makes it easy!
"Erhard Ducke" <duc### [at] gentlemansclubde> wrote in message
news:np7lrv4c262qcanltih9hid9f1hne87vg9@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:32:23 -0800, "Harold" <bai### [at] 3dculturecom>
> wrote:
>
> >Here in the USA we call those "Magic Eye" or "Hidden Image"
> >stereograms. Originally they were called Random Dot Stereograms (RDS).
> >They are a good way to learn to "free view" (no glasses or viewer used).
> >I find it easier to use the cross eye method, but most people don't
>
> No, I mean those pictures that are often printed in magazines. Mostly
> they consist of two separate pictures, e.g. classical paintings. One
> is the original and on the other one there are some parts of the
> original modified. When you watch the two pictures you have to search
> for the modified places, when you look 'parallel' to them like you do
> with stereoscopic photos you see the difference much faster...
> --
> Erhard Ducke
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:40:47 -0800, "Harold" <bai### [at] 3dculturecom>
wrote:
>Ohhhh.... those. Yeah. free viewing them makes it easy!
And...how are they named in English?
--
Erhard Ducke
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
