 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20-3-2013 21:37, MichaelJF wrote:
>
> Wonderful work again. Only one remark. The city wall is not surrounding the city
> completely which is a bit unusaul IMO. What is this structure to the right?
> There seems to be a citadel to the upper left, a temple straight ahead but I
> have no idea for the structure at the upper right.
Thanks indeed Michael. This is only a partial view of the city. See
image for a total view of the state of the art.
To the left, is the Citadel indeed; to the right is the Old Palace, a
derelict structure that was the residence of the Satraps before the
Uprising of [...]. The Citadel is their residence hence forward.
The Old Palace is only outlined and not yet modelled properly.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'gancaloon_17.jpg' (141 KB)
Preview of image 'gancaloon_17.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> With the new urbanism macro in place, here is a state of the art view
> of the old city behind the harbour of Gancaloon.
>
> Thomas
Looking fantastic already... my only complaint about the town is that
the scale seems a bit too big respect to the port buildings.
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21-3-2013 9:04, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Looking fantastic already... my only complaint about the town is that
> the scale seems a bit too big respect to the port buildings.
Thanks Jaime.
No, the scale is exactly identical/proportional. Wait for a view at
ground level.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21-3-2013 1:29, s.day wrote:
> Very impressive, are all the buildings generated by the macro or just the main
> town buildings (I mean not the ones in the harbour).
Only the houses forming the city blocks are generated by the macro.
>
> Also, is the wall part of the macro?
No, the walls are built separately.
>
> Do all your close up scenes I have seen posted use this macro as well?
No again. The macro is has just been finished recently. The close up
scenes first showed a crude simulation of sprawling urbanism that only
looked believable from far away, then recently a first approximation of
city blocks modelled by hand but not really satisfying.
From now on, the macro will be used.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> No, the scale is exactly identical/proportional. Wait for a view at
> ground level.
Hmmm... perhaps it's the windows size?
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21-3-2013 9:21, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> No, the scale is exactly identical/proportional. Wait for a view at
>> ground level.
>
> Hmmm... perhaps it's the windows size?
That may be possible indeed. I still have to tune the shapes. One side
effect of the macro (the random scaling) can make the windows a bit too
large in some cases. Also the black texture simulating the interior
contrasts too much and increases the effect probably.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21-3-2013 9:21, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> No, the scale is exactly identical/proportional. Wait for a view at
>> ground level.
>
> Hmmm... perhaps it's the windows size?
>
Yes, I think the window size is an issue.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'gancaloon.jpg' (236 KB)
Preview of image 'gancaloon.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> On 21-3-2013 9:21, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> >> No, the scale is exactly identical/proportional. Wait for a view at
> >> ground level.
> >
> > Hmmm... perhaps it's the windows size?
> >
>
> Yes, I think the window size is an issue.
>
> Thomas
A nice view, maybe also the window position rather than size. Some of the
windows appear to be in the middle of the floor they are on, most windows are
slighty higher than the middle.
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21-3-2013 9:21, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> No, the scale is exactly identical/proportional. Wait for a view at
>> ground level.
>
> Hmmm... perhaps it's the windows size?
>
This is definitely better :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'gancaloon.jpg' (236 KB)
Preview of image 'gancaloon.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21-3-2013 13:35, s.day wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> A nice view, maybe also the window position rather than size. Some of the
> windows appear to be in the middle of the floor they are on, most windows are
> slighty higher than the middle.
>
Yes, but the upper part of the (top) floors also contains the roof
terrace. So, it is a bit of an optical illusion ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
