 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Beautiful
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/08/2012 8:09, jhu wrote:
> Looks good.
thanks!
> How do you do that?
basically, I use any pattern that looks a bit like clouds as both a mask
for the edges of the clouds, and as a simulation for the shading (by
translating it towards the sun location, scaling it a tiny bit, and
translating it back)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/08/2012 8:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 12-8-2012 1:22, Zeger Knaepen wrote:
>> I think it's almost ready!
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> Very good indeed.
thank you :)
> Is this an update of your famed Fastcloud macro? I use /that/ very, very
> often, if not for practically all my scenes.
more like a rewrite than an update :)
The basic idea remains the same, the implementation has changed
completely, and IMHO it's much easier to use now:
#include "fastsky.inc"
//Optional, defaults to Belgium, I think :)
fastclouds_SetSceneLocation(Longitude,Latitude)
//Optional, defaults to a
//sunpos.inc-based location
fastclouds_SetSunLocation(Location)
//Optional
fastclouds_SetPredefinedCloudForm(Type,Transform)
//Optional, defaults to 1000
fastclouds_SetScale(UnitsPerKilometer)
fastclouds_AddClouds(Cast,Fluffyness,Transparancy)
fastclouds_AddSky(Hazyness)
fastclouds_AddLights(SunBrightness,SkyBrightness,Arealights)
//You can add more than one layer of clouds
fastclouds_AddClouds(Cast,Fluffyness,Transparancy)
> Needless to say that I am interested ;-)
I could send you the source if you want, you could help me betatest it :)
cu!
--
ZK
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/08/2012 9:48, BertvdB wrote:
> Beautiful
Thank you! :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/08/12 01:22, Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> I think it's almost ready!
> What do you think?
>
Definitely an improvement over the old version... I'm impatiently
waiting for it.
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12-8-2012 10:20, Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> I could send you the source if you want, you could help me betatest it :)
I would love to.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/08/2012 12:49, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> On 12/08/12 01:22, Zeger Knaepen wrote:
>> I think it's almost ready!
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> Definitely an improvement over the old version... I'm impatiently
> waiting for it.
Thanks, but try to be patient, as I still have work on documentation..
..and as it is now, there's no moon.. which leads to *very* dark night
skies :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Zeger Knaepen <zeg### [at] povplace com> wrote:
> I think it's almost ready!
> What do you think?
>
> remember, the sky is just a sky_sphere and some fog, there's no media.
> The noon-version rendered in just under 7 minutes, including 5s parsing
> time for the landscape. The sky without a landscape would render in
> about 25s.
no media and looking this awesome?!
where's the code?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/08/2012 21:45, nemesis wrote:
> no media and looking this awesome?!
:)
> where's the code?
it's not yet complete! almost there though :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 14-8-2012 0:01, Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> On 13/08/2012 21:45, nemesis wrote:
>> no media and looking this awesome?!
>
> :)
>
>> where's the code?
>
> it's not yet complete! almost there though :)
How is progress now, two months later? ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
