On 05/06/2012 02:42 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 5-5-2012 18:45, Stephen wrote:
>> On 05/05/2012 12:52 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>>> Last week was at a street fair and one of the vendors had this neat
>>> collection of scented oil burners, so I decided to create my own ...
>>> still some minor tweaks left but hey ... not bad so far!
>>
>> I quite like it. You may be able to export some to Thomas's Gancaloon.
>> It would fit right in.
>> BTW Is it supposed to be so dark? I had to adjust the gamma or contrast
>> to see it, properly.
>>
>
> I like that too indeed.

thanks
>
> In Gancaloon the camel fat oil too is *scented*... :-)

i imagine so

Post a reply to this message

On 06/05/2012 12:24 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
> What! Only two slicers ;-)

Only greedy people eat more than two slices of toast at a time. :-P
It is supposed to be a 50's toaster if you remember.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 06/05/2012 12:27 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>>
>> In Gancaloon the camel fat oil too is *scented*... :-)
>
> i imagine so

The name ammonia comes from the temple of Jupiter Ammon in Ancient 
Egypt. Where by burning camel's dung, sal ammoniac was produced.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 06/05/2012 12:12 PM, clipka wrote:
> Looks ok to me.

I looked at it again and I can see the background detail now. Yesterday 
I could not. Weird! And I had my eyes tested only a few months ago.
I am scratching my head over this.

Well Jim since the "Not Too Bright" fairy has gone away. I can 
appreciate it better. Old Dutch Masters spring to mind. Not Thomas, our 
very own old Dutch master but the other ones.


-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

> On 05/05/2012 6:47 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>> Thanks ... I'm working on the lighting now (radiosity) and it helps a
>> lot. I also was able to find the cause of an odd shadow just above the
>> flame (projected_through was the culprit) ... I'm also fiddling with the
>> area_light size looking for the correct effect. I also moved the
>> vertical backdrop closer to the object ... LOL like I said some minor
>> tweaks.
>
> Don't forget to post updates.
>
>> I just felt like posting what I had so far, because I liked the
>> overall look and feel ;-)
>
> Okay! I understand that. So here's what I've been working on. A cheeky
> entry for the "After Dark" topic in this TC-RTC. I suppose a few people
> here remember the Flying Toasters.
>
>

I see that just as The Ride Of The Valkyries is playing... Sweet!
I still have the install CD for the latest version.



Alain

Post a reply to this message

On 6-5-2012 15:42, Stephen wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 12:12 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Looks ok to me.
>
> I looked at it again and I can see the background detail now. Yesterday
> I could not. Weird! And I had my eyes tested only a few months ago.
> I am scratching my head over this.
Did you look at it After Dark...? ;-)

>
> Well Jim since the "Not Too Bright" fairy has gone away. I can
> appreciate it better. Old Dutch Masters spring to mind. Not Thomas, our
> very own old Dutch master but the other ones.

Aargh! Each time I finally hope to be elevated to the Empyrean of 
Sublime Art, those old farts come up from behind, pushing me to the side 
again and again! One day, mister van Rijn, I shall let you stumble over 
the edge for good :-)

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

On 07/05/2012 7:42 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Did you look at it After Dark...? ;-)
>

:-D

>
> Aargh! Each time I finally hope to be elevated to the Empyrean of
> Sublime Art, those old farts come up from behind, pushing me to the side
> again and again! One day, mister van Rijn, I shall let you stumble over
> the edge for good :-)

Is that Meneer Nicholas van Rijn or Meester Rembrandt?
If only there had been better lighting in the 17th century. Then I would 
have no complaints.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 07/05/2012 12:28 AM, Alain wrote:

> I see that just as The Ride Of The Valkyries is playing... Sweet!

LOL or the Dam Busters march.

Arrg! You know when you get a tune stuck in your head.
I've wasted time (and now time has wasted me).
Try looking at it with:
The British Grenadiers-Minden
Or
The Queen's Royal Hussars The Regimental Quick March.

> I still have the install CD for the latest version.

You can still find copies of it for download.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 05/07/2012 06:32 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 7:42 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> Did you look at it After Dark...? ;-)
>>
>
> :-D
>
>>
>> Aargh! Each time I finally hope to be elevated to the Empyrean of
>> Sublime Art, those old farts come up from behind, pushing me to the side
>> again and again! One day, mister van Rijn, I shall let you stumble over
>> the edge for good :-)
>
> Is that Meneer Nicholas van Rijn or Meester Rembrandt?
> If only there had been better lighting in the 17th century. Then I would
> have no complaints.
>
Here's a different version with radiosity ... unfortunately I seem to 
have picked up an artifact on the candle holder. Guess I should have not 
added that extra torus without re-doing my radiosity pass ... hmmm now 
It's got me wondering if doing a pass (radiosity) without subsurface on 
the wax pieces, to collect/save radiosity data, then do a pass with 
subsurface on. There was about a 17hr difference in render time. BTW: I 
DID have radiosity on (for the 2nd pass) in the globals subsurface block.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'work.png' (836 KB)

Preview of image 'work.png'

Am 06.05.2012 15:42, schrieb Stephen:
> On 06/05/2012 12:12 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Looks ok to me.
>
> I looked at it again and I can see the background detail now. Yesterday
> I could not. Weird! And I had my eyes tested only a few months ago.
> I am scratching my head over this.

Different ambient viewing conditions, maybe?

Post a reply to this message