 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi(gh)!
On 05.12.2011 23:01, Alain wrote:
> I mean more like two 65 x 5, each one about as whide as the individual
> tubes.
Here it is... really doesn't look too bad - but it took more than five
hours!
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '2011-12-06 includes showroom 1, take 65 - inside showroom near northeastern door, looking southwest.jpg' (79 KB)
Preview of image '2011-12-06 includes showroom 1, take 65 - inside showroom near northeastern door, looking southwest.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Hi(gh)!
>
> On 05.12.2011 23:01, Alain wrote:
>
>> I mean more like two 65 x 5, each one about as whide as the individual
>> tubes.
>
> Here it is... really doesn't look too bad - but it took more than five
> hours!
>
> See you in Khyberspace!
>
> Yadgar
Longer, but worth it. Keep the simplified gersion for tests, and this
for your final render.
You can also use radiosity here. Replace your tubes with emissive tubes,
use importance.
radiosity{samples 20000 [other radiosity items] }
default{radiosity{importance 75/20000}}
Most things will get only about 75 radiosity samples...
The neon tubes have:
radiosity{importance 1}
...but the tubes will get full sampling.
There are cases where radiosity is faster than regulat lighting.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
High!
On 09.12.2011 19:09, Alain wrote:
> You can also use radiosity here. Replace your tubes with emissive tubes,
> use importance.
The tubes are in fact emissive media tubes!
>
> radiosity{samples 20000 [other radiosity items] }
>
> default{radiosity{importance 75/20000}}
> Most things will get only about 75 radiosity samples...
>
> The neon tubes have:
> radiosity{importance 1}
I haven't yet worked into the new radiosity features of 3.7...
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> High!
>
> On 09.12.2011 19:09, Alain wrote:
>
>> You can also use radiosity here. Replace your tubes with emissive tubes,
>> use importance.
>
> The tubes are in fact emissive media tubes!
Why's that?
Using emissive finish should do the job just as well, and is likely to
be faster.
>> radiosity{samples 20000 [other radiosity items] }
>>
>> default{radiosity{importance 75/20000}}
>> Most things will get only about 75 radiosity samples...
>>
>> The neon tubes have:
>> radiosity{importance 1}
>
> I haven't yet worked into the new radiosity features of 3.7...
I personally wouldn't recommend it by the way. I don't think
radiosity-only illumination will give you any speedup here, you'll risk
splotches, and you'll be unable to get any good highlights unless you
use blurred reflections (which will slow down rendering again).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
