 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Some soap bubbles, rendered with a complete re-design of the iridescence
feature.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'test.png' (335 KB)
Preview of image 'test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
... and two pearls.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'test.png' (139 KB)
Preview of image 'test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A bearing ball with a thin coat of I-have-no-idea-what.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'test.png' (187 KB)
Preview of image 'test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> Some soap bubbles, rendered with a complete re-design of the iridescence
> feature.
Oh! Very nice! Will this fix make it into 3.7?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1-12-2011 4:19, clipka wrote:
> Some soap bubbles, rendered with a complete re-design of the iridescence
> feature.
Excellent! A little treat for Jim's shells... ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 01.12.2011 07:39, schrieb waggy:
> clipka wrote:
>> Some soap bubbles, rendered with a complete re-design of the iridescence
>> feature.
>
> Oh! Very nice! Will this fix make it into 3.7?
I think so. It will break scenes relying on the crappy(*) existing
iridescence, so it's better to introduce it with the transition from 3.6
to 3.7, rather than 3.7.0 to 3.7.1 or something.
(*For starters, the existing implementation doesn't respect a light
source's color, or even brightness for that matter.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 01.12.2011 04:23, schrieb clipka:
> .... and two pearls.
now with blurred reflection.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'test.png' (201 KB)
Preview of image 'test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 01.12.2011 09:23, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 1-12-2011 4:19, clipka wrote:
>> Some soap bubbles, rendered with a complete re-design of the iridescence
>> feature.
> Excellent! A little treat for Jim's shells... ;-)
Yup.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/30/2011 10:19 PM, clipka wrote:
> Some soap bubbles, rendered with a complete re-design of the iridescence
> feature.
Outstanding ... I'll keep an eye on revision control. I'm anxious to get
it a test drive. Since, it would seem, that my sea shell attempt at
using iridescence is what inspired you to dig into this, I have a
question about the aoi pattern that was mentioned as an alternative ...
you wouldn't expect it (aoi) to respond to other pattern modifiers
correct, as it doesn't appear to. However when I read the doc passage,
"It gives a value proportional to the angle between the ray and the
surface" it makes me think that's correct behavior. If this is true
enough, perhaps I should make a slight addition to that passage to clarify.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/01/2011 03:23 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 1-12-2011 4:19, clipka wrote:
>> Some soap bubbles, rendered with a complete re-design of the iridescence
>> feature.
> Excellent! A little treat for Jim's shells... ;-)
>
> Thomas
>
don't you just love good news first thing in the morning!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
