 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I have corrected as much as possible the wing positions of the white Pigeon.
> Difficult. Poser has a lot of parameters, but folded wings are the most
> difficult to get right. Imo, this is better, though.
>
> adapted saturation/lightness to get the white robe and made/added a bump map
> too.
>
> Before uploading, what do you think? And you want also the flying pigeon to
> be white I suppose? ;-)
>
> Thomas
>
>
Yes, the olded wings are MUCH beter now.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> "Alain"<aze### [at] qwerty org> schreef in bericht
> news:4db6ffeb$1@news.povray.org...
>> The pigeon on the ground just feels wrong. You should not see the wings
>> that much, just hint at them.
>>
>> The one in flight looks correct.
>
> Yeah... I was feeling inconfortable with that too. This is a standard pose
> from Poser. I shall see what I can do.
>
> Thomas
>
>
It can pass, if the bird is some distance away, and not seen from the
front. It's quite possible that if seen from in profile, it may barely show.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/27/2011 03:03 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 26/04/2011 11:04 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> WHAT!!! You want me to soil my lilywhite hands on software generated
>> code?
>>
>
> One with a bit of wind, one without.
>
> With is subdivided.
>
Well no doubt the one with wind ... Did you use a light group on the
character? I'm still playing around with the version I sent you, but man
I kind of liking where you're headed with yours.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi people
I would like to join the challenge. Is it necessary to have a short code at the
end of the day? Or is it only about the picture?
How about to make a complete new code, that may become extreme big? You could
have it online. And if needed, the people can download the code from the
povray-website.
Best rgds. from the outer Rim
Holger :)
Le_Forgeron <jgr### [at] freefr> wrote:
> See p.general : a challenge of sorts
>
> Recreating the image (provided scene is free of rights, update & change
> as you wants)
>
> There is room for improvements.
>
> comment the arealight's line for a very quicker render (but stronger
> shadows)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '252171749.jpg' (124 KB)
Preview of image '252171749.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Holsenback" <jho### [at] povrayorg> schreef in bericht
news:4db81009$1@news.povray.org...
> yep
It's done, Jim. The files are under way to you.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/28/2011 04:10 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> "Jim Holsenback"<jho### [at] povrayorg> schreef in bericht
> news:4db81009$1@news.povray.org...
>> yep
>
> It's done, Jim. The files are under way to you.
>
> Thomas
>
>
thanks thomas ... got em
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How is the image progressing?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 05/04/2011 05:40 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> How is the image progressing?
>
> Thomas
>
>
In small steps ... I believe Stephen is still working on some minor
issues with the clothing on his character. I'm still tweaking on the
lighting and radiosity ... long time between renders now. RL issues are
proving more of a challenge right now (shop is open) ... stay tuned ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 05/04/2011 05:40 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> How is the image progressing?
>
> Thomas
>
>
I've had to abandon the notion of having the character up close to the
camera, and this version is the result of a typo, that sent me in
another direction. Now I have to come up with something different to
work the pov logo into the scene (it was in the orb the character is
holding) ... also thinking of getting rid of the stairs.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ndi.png' (516 KB)
Preview of image 'ndi.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Are there any plans to add that scene to the portfolio of POV-Ray sample
scenes? If so, then the Poser models are most likely a no-go due to
licensing issues. Definitely can't distribute the textures, and most
likely can't distribute meshes either, even in already posed form.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
