 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
... and corrected the bump size...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'PoserFiguretest.png' (414 KB)
Preview of image 'PoserFiguretest.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 27/04/2011 10:57, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
> ... and corrected the bump size...
>
> Thomas
>
>
I have an issue with the size of the gland on the beak of the dove (far
too big), as well as the colour of the beak (would need more orange/red).
Also the teint around the eye is more black/dark grey
(have a google search for "dove bird" ?)
--
Software is like dirt - it costs time and money to change it and move it
around.
Just because you can't see it, it doesn't weigh anything,
and you can't drill a hole in it and stick a rivet into it doesn't mean
it's free.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27/04/2011 10:29 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> I have an issue with the size of the gland on the beak of the dove (far
> too big), as well as the colour of the beak (would need more orange/red).
>
> Also the teint around the eye is more black/dark grey
>
But how much of the detail will be visible in the render?
You (Thomas that is) could spend days working on it just for them to
appear as small birds in the distance.
I like them.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/27/2011 07:05 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 27/04/2011 10:29 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>> I have an issue with the size of the gland on the beak of the dove (far
>> too big), as well as the colour of the beak (would need more orange/red).
>>
>> Also the teint around the eye is more black/dark grey
>>
>
> But how much of the detail will be visible in the render?
> You (Thomas that is) could spend days working on it just for them to
> appear as small birds in the distance.
>
> I like them.
>
yep 2nd shot (better bump map) looks fine .... and yes the distance
makes the fine detail more trouble than we need for this scenario. oh
yeah both white ... thanks thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/27/2011 05:35 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 26/04/2011 1:28 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> I think you were just going with your comfort zone using bishop to see
>> how it looked in the scene ... I think we're past that so poseray with
>> object centered with y=0 at bottom of character gives me the best
>> flexibility, if I'm not making you jump through too many hoops ;-)
>
yeah ... know what you mean that's probably why I made the pigeon goof.
This scene is getting to be a bit of a juggling act.
>
> MAT file.
>
> Move and scale the meshes as a group.
>
thank you :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Le_Forgeron" <lef### [at] free fr> schreef in bericht
news:4db7e213@news.povray.org...
> I have an issue with the size of the gland on the beak of the dove (far
> too big), as well as the colour of the beak (would need more orange/red).
>
> Also the teint around the eye is more black/dark grey
Poser figures come "as is". Only way to change the geometry would be by
post-processing in Silo or Wings3D, but that is more trouble than that it's
worth presently, considering the pigeons' size in the render. There is no
way to change the figures in Poser.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Holsenback" <jho### [at] povrayorg> schreef in bericht
news:4db7fa63$1@news.povray.org...
> yep 2nd shot (better bump map) looks fine .... and yes the distance makes
> the fine detail more trouble than we need for this scenario. oh yeah both
> white ... thanks thomas
Okidoki! I shall finalize and upload them.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Problem now however, is that I cannot upload to the group due to the size of
the message (about 9 mb). The increase is due I believe to the addition of
normals to the geometry.
Jim, I can make a Big File transfer to you. Is that ok?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/27/2011 09:18 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Problem now however, is that I cannot upload to the group due to the size of
> the message (about 9 mb). The increase is due I believe to the addition of
> normals to the geometry.
>
> Jim, I can make a Big File transfer to you. Is that ok?
>
> Thomas
>
>
yep
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/04/2011 11:04 PM, Stephen wrote:
> WHAT!!! You want me to soil my lilywhite hands on software generated code?
>
One with a bit of wind, one without.
With is subdivided.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'smca_ndi2a.jpg' (100 KB)
Download 'smca_ndi2b.jpg' (99 KB)
Preview of image 'smca_ndi2a.jpg'
Preview of image 'smca_ndi2b.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
