 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/4/2011 5:14 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> > >
> > > far be it for me to buck tradition (checkered planes) but has anyone
> > > tried the tiling pattern?
> > >
> > > http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_5.5#Tiling
> > >
> > > Mirrored (at the mid-point) color/texture maps work best
> >
> > I have... and Pavement, too. Fun stuff. As I said before, lots of new
> > stuff to play with. The tiling patterns will definitely add a new
> > dimension to scenes that use strictly procedural textures. I like it.
>
> Wow, this completely passed me by. Excellent, I must have a play!
Well how about that, I missed this too.
What I also would've liked is a 2D crackle pattern. There I times when I need a
2D version and a simple slice of 3D isn't quite the same. I did try my hand at
coding this once with a little success, but unfortunately I'm not completely
adept at putting the code together for proper inclusion...
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not, NOT rendering SSLT checkered spheres over checkered planes....
>
> Looks good!
>
> Here's mine. Gratuitous sslt instead of your more subtle approach!
>
> :)
Bill, this is beautiful in its minimalism, and the gratuitous SSLT works really
well here. Nice :)
-------------------------------------------------
www.McGregorFineArt.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Final render:
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'chextest3.jpg' (203 KB)
Preview of image 'chextest3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/4/2011 7:59 AM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Mike Raiford<"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm not, NOT rendering SSLT checkered spheres over checkered planes....
>
> Looks good!
>
> Here's mine. Gratuitous sslt instead of your more subtle approach!
>
> :)
Ohhhhh... NICE. I like it :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 03.03.2011 22:30, schrieb Stephen:
> Who is going to do a SSLT sphere on a chequered plane?
Been there, done that ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/03/2011 12:52 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> no worries there Stephen ...
:-D
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/03/2011 1:59 PM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Here's mine. Gratuitous sslt instead of your more subtle approach!
Nice and as someone used to say at my old judo class. "A good big un
always beats a good little un" B*gg*r the subtly. :-P
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/03/2011 10:32 PM, Mike Raiford wrote:
> Final render:
>
Very nice.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/03/2011 2:06 PM, Stephen wrote:
> Thanks I'm running a render on my old dual core laptop. with the default
> values and samples 10 and aperture 0.400.
> It is rendering at 8 pps 2 hours into it an 17% done.
I don't think I try that again soon. It took 24 minutes less than a day
and a half for 800 X 450 pixels.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> Final render:
Nice!
Why is the reflection of the sphere not affected by the depth of field though?
Looks wrong to me...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
