 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews wrote:
> I've been trying a little slant
> to the camera to make things interesting.
IMO the only reason that works is you have the incoming flying car slanted
the other way, so it gives the impression you're seeing it from the pov of
the car. Without the car, it would just be "hey, straighten up that
picture." Nice job.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews wrote:
> You might remember that I had started this scene a few months ago; well,
> I finally got around to doing something with it.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
...some additions...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'babel_02.jpg' (422 KB)
Preview of image 'babel_02.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews schrieb:
> ...some additions...
I think the additional shuttles in the foreground don't work - not
unless you also add some in the background, too. Otherwise, them not
suffering much fog makes them somwehat isolated.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews wrote:
> Kirk Andrews wrote:
>> You might remember that I had started this scene a few months ago;
>> well, I finally got around to doing something with it.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
> ...some additions...
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Nice.
I would like to add that the background towers, while neat, appear to be
completely different styles than the foreground, creating a
discontinuity (at least for me).
clipka's observation about the clustering of shuttles in the foreground
makes sense to me, maybe some dark outlines poking out of the fog in the
back would help.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
CShake schrieb:
> I would like to add that the background towers, while neat, appear to be
> completely different styles than the foreground, creating a
> discontinuity (at least for me).
A different multicorp with a totally different company image, maybe?
I find nothing wrong about it. It has its own aesthetics at any rate.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> Kirk Andrews schrieb:
>
>> ...some additions...
>
> I think the additional shuttles in the foreground don't work - not
> unless you also add some in the background, too. Otherwise, them not
> suffering much fog makes them somwehat isolated.
Quite true. In fact, I'd like to have some really massive 'somethings'
hanging around back there in the fog; I'm just not sure what, yet.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> CShake schrieb:
>
>> I would like to add that the background towers, while neat, appear to
>> be completely different styles than the foreground, creating a
>> discontinuity (at least for me).
>
> A different multicorp with a totally different company image, maybe?
>
> I find nothing wrong about it. It has its own aesthetics at any rate.
That was my excuse for using it, anyway. It was ready made from a macro
I had written some time ago. Ideally, I think I'd like it to match a
little better.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews <kir### [at] tektonart com> wrote:
> ...some additions...
Beautiful. The irregularities on the water's surface due to gusting are
particularly effective (assuming that was the goal!). Don't add too much though,
be a shame to spoil a nice quiet ocean!
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonartcom> schreef in bericht
news:4afb4ead@news.povray.org...
> Kirk Andrews wrote:
>> You might remember that I had started this scene a few months ago; well,
>> I finally got around to doing something with it.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
> ...some additions...
>
I think Darren was quite right! Without those initial shuttles rotated
counterclockwise, the tilt of the image loses its punch.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
High!
Robert McGregor wrote:
> Very cool Kirk; I love the Dutch camera angle :)
Er... what is so Dutch about banking a camera? Enlighten me... I'm sure
it has got nothing to do the old masters of the Flemish renaissance
school...
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Now playing: Thug (ZZ Top - the only rock band which would not have been
bombed right off the stage when daring an concert journey across
Afghanistan under Taliban rule!)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
