![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Samuel Benge wrote:
> Nice, as usual ;)
Thanks!
> Are those roots I see down at the water line? Pretty cool. I
> see what looks like iron-rich pockets in the stone. A major vacation in the
> cliff side also shows iron-like deposits on it's lip, possibly indicating that a
> ruddy pocket was worn away by weathering. Which looks rather convincing!
>
Well, I used the same functions to texture it as I did to create the
isosurface, so it made it easy to make the crevices darker. Still it
doesn't quite look like rock to me yet--could use some more work.
> The trees look pretty good, convincing in many places. The shading also
> harmonizes with the landmass in a good way. Maybe some ocean weathering on the
> trees would enhance the realism of this render?
>
> Any way, it looks like it would be a fun place to explore! Your image is
> inspiring :)
>
> Sam
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Beautiful.
>
Thanks!
>> Maybe I'll build a
>> lighthouse.
>
> How about some wooden platforms/boardwalks? More difficult, I know, but...
>
> Bill
>
That's a good idea...its got me thinking.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Kirk Andrews wrote:
> Yeah, more doodling. After all the massive scenes I've been doing, I
> thought I'd try something on a little smaller scale. I also thought I'd
> dig out those isosurfaces that I've been ignoring. Maybe I'll build a
> lighthouse.
never stop the doodling! Man, your pictures always have such an oil
painting feel...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonart com> schreef in bericht
news:4ae79033$1@news.povray.org...
> Samuel Benge wrote:
>> Nice, as usual ;)
>
> Thanks!
>
>> Are those roots I see down at the water line? Pretty cool. I
>> see what looks like iron-rich pockets in the stone. A major vacation in
>> the
>> cliff side also shows iron-like deposits on it's lip, possibly indicating
>> that a
>> ruddy pocket was worn away by weathering. Which looks rather convincing!
>>
> Well, I used the same functions to texture it as I did to create the
> isosurface, so it made it easy to make the crevices darker. Still it
> doesn't quite look like rock to me yet--could use some more work.
>
I join my praize to Sam's here.
Maybe you are not entirely satisfied with the rock because this type of
weathering is expected on a smaller scale? I have seen this kind of
rocks/weathering in Southern France amongst others, but at a factor 10
smaller overall if not more.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonart com> wrote in message
news:4ae750d9@news.povray.org...
> Yeah, more doodling. After all the massive scenes I've been doing, I
> thought I'd try something on a little smaller scale. I also thought I'd
> dig out those isosurfaces that I've been ignoring. Maybe I'll build a
> lighthouse.
scape's are very difficult ... i like this one and you've done a very fine
job.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Yeah, more doodling. After all the massive scenes I've been doing, I
> thought I'd try something on a little smaller scale. I also thought I'd
> dig out those isosurfaces that I've been ignoring. Maybe I'll build a
> lighthouse.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
A "doodle"?
I'd like to see more full scenes coming close to the level of your
doodles ;)
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Maybe you are not entirely satisfied with the rock because this type of
> weathering is expected on a smaller scale? I have seen this kind of
> rocks/weathering in Southern France amongst others, but at a factor 10
> smaller overall if not more.
>
> Thomas
>
Ah! Thomas, you're right! Perhaps this is a bit of an improvement?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'isorocktests2.jpg' (382 KB)
Preview of image 'isorocktests2.jpg'
![isorocktests2.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C4ae8a97d%40news.povray.org%3E/isorocktests2.jpg?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Kirk Andrews wrote:
>> Maybe you are not entirely satisfied with the rock because this type
>> of weathering is expected on a smaller scale? I have seen this kind of
>> rocks/weathering in Southern France amongst others, but at a factor 10
>> smaller overall if not more.
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>
> Ah! Thomas, you're right! Perhaps this is a bit of an improvement?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Actually, now that I've posted it, it doesn't look so different from the
old one...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] tektonart com> schreef in bericht
news:4ae8a9ce$1@news.povray.org...
> Actually, now that I've posted it, it doesn't look so different from the
> old one...
<grin> indeed. It doesn't matter though, because it is a great rock anyway.
Photorealism is not necessarily to be achieved here.
In terms of weathering/erosion by the sea, I suppose that the surface would
be smoother, with the weathered holes above the sea level, or as notches
within the area between high and low tide. Notches in fact would be a great
improvement and would look very natural.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Alain wrote:
> A "doodle"?
>
> I'd like to see more full scenes coming close to the level of your
> doodles ;)
>
>
> Alain
Heh, thanks. Well, I've got another one of those weekends of
never-ending class. We'll see what comes out.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |