 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'we_meat_redux_16_bit.jp2' (99 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
With wich programm can I see it please ?!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:28:44 +0100, "LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscali fr>
wrote:
>With wich programm can I see it please ?!
>
Repeated:
Since you appear to be a Windows user, try this:
http://www.downloadfreetrial.com/multimedia/mult14139.html
Personally, I use Infranview:
http://www.tucows.com/preview/194967.html
(but this may require the extra plugins. The download page appears to
claim JPEG2000 as standard but I always thought it required a plugin )
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Can't read file
JC
--
http://exether.free.fr/irtc (more IRTC stats !)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You could save even more bandwidth by posting just a link to wherever you
choose to upload the file.
--
light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jellby wrote:
> You could save even more bandwidth by posting just a link to wherever you
> choose to upload the file.
Or not posting at all ... :-)
Oouppss I've been trolling here ...
JC
--
http://exether.free.fr/irtc (more IRTC stats !)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscalifr> wrote in message
news:404b93f0@news.povray.org...
> With wich programm can I see it please ?!
This is the second time this happened -- a file that isn't "common" enough
to read. There's all kinds of software out there -- howzabout we make a FAQ
and page for this group that links to that software so we can all get
up-to-date? I totally understand the desire to show these images in the way
they were intended to be shown and it's all just a matter of software. If I
knew where to find this stuff, I'd put it up myself (that, and if I was just
a little bit less lazy) ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 23:00:27 +0100, Jellby <jel### [at] M-yahoocom>
wrote:
>You could save even more bandwidth by posting just a link to wherever you
>choose to upload the file.
I'd still get some saying they could not see the file after following
the link - so thanks for the suggestion, but it's not going to solve
that particular problem.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:08:44 -0600, "Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom>
wrote:
>"LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscalifr> wrote in message
>news:404b93f0@news.povray.org...
>> With wich programm can I see it please ?!
>
>This is the second time this happened -- a file that isn't "common" enough
>to read. There's all kinds of software out there -- howzabout we make a FAQ
>and page for this group that links to that software so we can all get
>up-to-date? I totally understand the desire to show these images in the way
>they were intended to be shown and it's all just a matter of software. If I
>knew where to find this stuff, I'd put it up myself (that, and if I was just
>a little bit less lazy) ;-)
Well if you cross your fingers extra-hard, the FAQ controllers might
stir. But I'd not get your hopes up.
>
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:b38n4094p4s07mpl7eqhsaoch3kos8pgeg@4ax.com...
<snip />
> >This is the second time this happened -- a file that isn't "common"
enough
> >to read. There's all kinds of software out there -- howzabout we make a
FAQ
> >and page for this group that links to that software so we can all get
> >up-to-date? I totally understand the desire to show these images in the
way
> >they were intended to be shown and it's all just a matter of software. If
I
> >knew where to find this stuff, I'd put it up myself (that, and if I was
just
> >a little bit less lazy) ;-)
>
> Well if you cross your fingers extra-hard, the FAQ controllers might
> stir. But I'd not get your hopes up.
I don't blame them either -- Google's my home page after all :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
