![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to render
because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'waterlilies.jpg' (305 KB)
Preview of image 'waterlilies.jpg'
![waterlilies.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C49952923%40news.povray.org%3E/waterlilies.jpg?ttop=443866&toff=2850&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to render
> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.
I like the goldfish. The lilies and the flowers could use some more texturing.
Maybe put a frog in there. And perhaps a shark with lasers...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to render
> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.
Synchronicity in action I guess - I haven't seen any water lilies in quite a
while but I just saw Gilles' new postings on Oyonale yesterday, including these
AMAZING water lilies (but would we expect anything less from him?)
http://www.oyonale.com/image.php?code=916&mode=info§ion=2008&lang=en
Cheers,
Rob
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Yes, they must have "lasers", it would definately be "evil".
:-D
ian
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.4995823828be4b88b562d820@news.povray.org...
> "Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to
>> render
>> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.
>
> I like the goldfish. The lilies and the flowers could use some more
> texturing.
> Maybe put a frog in there. And perhaps a shark with lasers...
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I never see water that clean/clear around here, even at a pond fed by a
spring. Reminds of some Florida springs I've seen before. Must be happy
fish, unless that also means less food. ha ha
: )
Wavy grid-like appearance at upper right is curious, thought it was
reflection but must be the light-play from photons used and water surface
shape(?).
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Yes, even though lily pads are flat mine are especially flat.
Hmm, laser sharks...
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.4995823828be4b88b562d820@news.povray.org...
> "Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to
>> render
>> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.
>
> I like the goldfish. The lilies and the flowers could use some more
> texturing.
> Maybe put a frog in there. And perhaps a shark with lasers...
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Same color even. Am working on another version, different cultivar :)
"Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineart com> wrote in message
news:web.4995a0cc28be4b886ff1d480@news.povray.org...
> "Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to
>> render
>> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.
>
> Synchronicity in action I guess - I haven't seen any water lilies in quite
> a
> while but I just saw Gilles' new postings on Oyonale yesterday, including
> these
> AMAZING water lilies (but would we expect anything less from him?)
>
> http://www.oyonale.com/image.php?code=916&mode=info§ion=2008&lang=en
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Yes, I used photons and they are brighter in the deeper water. Probably
because that is the area where the focus is the sharpest.
Speaking of clean water, I had a version with scattering media that looked
very murky. Might try that again, although it didn't look like a good place
for the fish to live
"Bob" <omniverse*charter!net> wrote in message
news:499606a8$1@news.povray.org...
>I never see water that clean/clear around here, even at a pond fed by a
>spring. Reminds of some Florida springs I've seen before. Must be happy
>fish, unless that also means less food. ha ha
> : )
> Wavy grid-like appearance at upper right is curious, thought it was
> reflection but must be the light-play from photons used and water surface
> shape(?).
>
> Bob
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |