 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> Looks like a fitting topic for the current TINA-CHeP contest round...
guess where i looked for inspiration on some test object to model ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> o Stretching textures does not seem to work, though
> applying textures and stretching geometry does.
>
interesting approach. Of course it depends what you mean by 'works'
For instance, you have a rusty pot, then you add a bulge to the pot.
Does the grain of the rust expand with the bulge or remain constant? I
suspect the former when you want the latter. On the other hand you have
a balloon with a happy face. You distaort the balloon and the happy
face distorts accordingly. This is the desired result.
No worries btw. When you get more sophisticated in all this you will
learn there are tools such as uv-mapper which will allow you to recreate
the uv's that the modelling tool originally assigns.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> schreef in bericht
news:web.496a55d8cf7e92393dcb84c80@news.povray.org...
> "Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
>> That is a *sine qua non* (latin for: not possible without (very free
>> translation) )
>
> .... or, literally, "without which not"...
>
> (which is to say, your "very free" translation quite hits the spot
> already)
>
<grin> my latin is extremely rusty these days.....
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
> > (which is to say, your "very free" translation quite hits the spot
> > already)
>
> <grin> my latin is extremely rusty these days.....
Well, mine has always been - never got polished in the first place ;) But some
of the basics still stick.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Cousin Ricky" <ric### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
> Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
> > Oh, and it wasn't my intention to model anything naughty,
>
> Naughty? How do you mean?
As in revolting and disgusting apparently, the reason I ignored it.
Now if she was hot, as in beauty, symmetry and magnificent splendor, I'd have to
see more.
Really a bad choice to post anything so ... disturbing might be the word I am
looking for ...
NOW! Anyone who gets offend at true grand majesty should be slapped up the
back-side of the head, because they are really just unspeakably jealous.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'smooth_reductr279.png' (140 KB)
Preview of image 'smooth_reductr279.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
