 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stbenge <^@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It's actually quite
> a simple effect to create.
That's a pretty amazing image. Bad, but in a good way. ;-)
When I was a kid, I had a camera that took pictures like this (on a large-format
negative!) Rather horrible results--but it was one of my most cherished
possessions!
Ken W.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlDOTnet> wrote:
>> news:47b2dd5d@news.povray.org...
>>> I wonder whether there is any positive correlation between being a
>>> raytracing geek and being bearded (like with other pastimes/occupations
>>> like programming in general or astronomy)...
>>>
>> There seems to be! I have a full beard :-)
>>
>
> Yeah, I have a mous... mos... a mustache and a little beard--both of which are
> starting to turn white. Egads!
>
Permanent two-day beards count as "being bearded"? ;)
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> schreef in bericht
news:49675ca1@news.povray.org...
>
> Permanent two-day beards count as "being bearded"? ;)
>
Well... I am afraid that *permanent* and *two-day* are a bit in conflict
here, so the Beards Club Board of Directors will spend a session discussing
this issue. You will be notified.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> "Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> schreef in bericht
> news:49675ca1@news.povray.org...
>> Permanent two-day beards count as "being bearded"? ;)
>>
>
> Well... I am afraid that *permanent* and *two-day* are a bit in conflict
> here, so the Beards Club Board of Directors will spend a session discussing
> this issue. You will be notified.
>
> Thomas
>
>
I mean that I shave off everyday, but not fully. :)
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:46:19 +0100, "Thomas de Groot"
<tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
>
>"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> schreef in bericht
>news:49675ca1@news.povray.org...
>>
>> Permanent two-day beards count as "being bearded"? ;)
>>
>
>Well... I am afraid that *permanent* and *two-day* are a bit in conflict
>here, so the Beards Club Board of Directors will spend a session discussing
>this issue. You will be notified.
What about the white hair club, Thomas?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:46:19 +0100, "Thomas de Groot"
> <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
>
>> "Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> schreef in bericht
>> news:49675ca1@news.povray.org...
>>> Permanent two-day beards count as "being bearded"? ;)
>>>
>> Well... I am afraid that *permanent* and *two-day* are a bit in conflict
>> here, so the Beards Club Board of Directors will spend a session discussing
>> this issue. You will be notified.
>
> What about the white hair club, Thomas?
And let's not forget the no hair club.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
triple_r wrote:
> stbenge <^@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Oops, I didn't realize what you were asking for. I just posted an
>> updated copy of the code to povray.text.scene-files. It's actually quite
>> a simple effect to create. It's not physically accurate, but should be
>> enough to get you started :)
>
> Nice. Not half bad for a demo scene. Let's see... film grain, bokeh, chromatic
> aberration, lens flare, lightsys... I guess JPEG artifacts are easy enough to
> add. That still leaves purple fringing, blue channel noise, crud on the
> sensor. Collect that into a coherent system, and we'd have a pretty
> comprehensive camera model!
Well we could go the extra mile and put a fingertip near the edge :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Carlo C. wrote:
> stbenge <^@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Carlo C. wrote:
> If stbenge did not exist, we should invent it. ;-)
>
> Thanks for the time you've spent.
> Thank you!
You're welcome :)
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kenneth wrote:
> stbenge <^@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's actually quite
>> a simple effect to create.
>
> That's a pretty amazing image. Bad, but in a good way. ;-)
The houses? It's rubbish :( It's actually a test scene for a
neighborhood of houses setup I was working on the other day. I idea was
to test cells and place the appropriate unit block according to the
surrounding cells. It works, but adding complexity seems to multiply
certain problems like roof shingles not meeting up right.
> When I was a kid, I had a camera that took pictures like this (on a large-format
> negative!) Rather horrible results--but it was one of my most cherished
> possessions!
My webcam takes aberrated shots similar to this. I had originally
designed the code so that I could add fake elements to scenes and tie
them into real photos. I can still do that, but I doubt I would be able
to fool any of you :)
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stbenge, I tried your aberrate scene today and I can get the film grain to work
but not the chromatic abberation. I've tried using both the default settings
and some random ones on my own. Any advice as to what I might be missing would
be greatly appreciated. I really want to try abberatting some pictures because
it will contribute a lot to my undetailed amateur images. =) Thank you for the
work you put into this! If it matters, I'm using POV 3.6.1 on a windows
machine.
Bridgeofstraws
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
