|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mmm... that ship *is* too close to the event horizon! ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007-05-06 09:21:
> Mmm... that ship *is* too close to the event horizon! ;-)
In space, it's extremely hard to corectly evaluate distances. The black hole may
be at a somewhat safe distance...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alain wrote:
> Orchid XP v3 nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007-05-06 09:21:
>
>> Mmm... that ship *is* too close to the event horizon! ;-)
>
> In space, it's extremely hard to corectly evaluate distances. The black
> hole may be at a somewhat safe distance...
Well, if it's a stellar black hole, the schwarzschild radius shouldn't
be more than a few hundred km and you don't want to see that as a disk.
If it's a super-massive black hole, you don't want to be close enough
to see a single star falling in as a large disk.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alain wrote:
> Orchid XP v3 nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007-05-06 09:21:
>> Mmm... that ship *is* too close to the event horizon! ;-)
> In space, it's extremely hard to corectly evaluate distances. The black
> hole may be at a somewhat safe distance...
But in that case, why is the ship distorted too?
Jerome
- --
+------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
| mailto:jeb### [at] freefr | ICQ: 238062172 |
| http://jeberger.free.fr/ | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGPfwkd0kWM4JG3k8RAkdeAKCGWEv7XyMHjKe6ryP2IqtcUV2ZhwCfWKAV
QTQt2VhZt1G5vgcqa7YBBEg=
=Q+tD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alain wrote:
> In space, it's extremely hard to corectly evaluate distances.
Mmm, too true... ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The vortex effect add a lot to the picture.
I find it well balanced in that view. Congratulations
Chaps
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Christian Froeschlin" <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote in message
news:463dfbc5$1@news.povray.org...
> Alain wrote:
>> Orchid XP v3 nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007-05-06 09:21:
>>
>>> Mmm... that ship *is* too close to the event horizon! ;-)
>>
>> In space, it's extremely hard to corectly evaluate distances. The black
>> hole may be at a somewhat safe distance...
>
> Well, if it's a stellar black hole, the schwarzschild radius shouldn't
> be more than a few hundred km and you don't want to see that as a disk.
> If it's a super-massive black hole, you don't want to be close enough
> to see a single star falling in as a large disk.
Fascinating discussion, really, but I feel obliged to point out that any
resemblance to real spatial phenomena is entirely coincedental! :-D
My sum total knowledge of black holes consists of stuff I've picked up from
Star Trek and the song Supermassive Black Hole by Muse.
--
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:463e667b@news.povray.org...
> Fascinating discussion, really, but I feel obliged to point out that any
> resemblance to real spatial phenomena is entirely coincedental! :-D
Let's just say that at that distance from the hole, that ship is not leaving
again, unless it can travel at a speed very close to the speed of light.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:463dcd87@news.povray.org...
> Swirly effect! I added a radial normal to my distortion effect, which is
> ramped up towards the middle of the effect to things get swirled more the
> closer they get.
>
Very nice. I'm still not sure about the distortion ring around the hole,
though it looks better than before.
A suggestion for more 'realism'. Red-shift the colours slightly based on
their proximity to the hole.
Light travelling near a black hole looses energy, in addition to being bent
towards the hole. This loss of energy results in colours being shifted down
towards the red end of the spectrum.
I don't know how hard that will be, or how good it will look
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Black Hole Research - new version
Date: 7 May 2007 02:53:31
Message: <463ecceb@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> schreef in bericht
news:463dcd87@news.povray.org...
> Swirly effect! I added a radial normal to my distortion effect, which is
> ramped up towards the middle of the effect to things get swirled more the
> closer they get.
>
Nice indeed! Much better.
I agree with Gail about the ring. I imagine that the black hole would be
totally black.... Now, where did I read that black holes would have a
slightly bluish glow...??? I can't remember.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |