 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I originally wanted this to be a starting point for another round of
Pov-pong, but this image took just shy of an hour to render on my 2GHz
Athlon.
I swiped Sam's head and Aero's eyes from the last pong round.
Everything else is from my own twisted imagination. :-) Don't ask.
... Actually, this could have been the starting point for a really
bizarre TiNA CheP image ...
--
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when you find yourself
daydreaming for hours on end what it would be like to go back in time
and give Michealangelo a decent raytracer.
Taps a.k.a. Tapio Vocadlo
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'trippypong.jpg' (137 KB)
Download 'trippypong.zip' (103 KB)
Preview of image 'trippypong.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
William Tracy wrote:
> I originally wanted this to be a starting point for another round of
> Pov-pong, but this image took just shy of an hour to render on my 2GHz
> Athlon.
Well, if you care to share, we still can pong it :). It'll just take a
bit longer to render, but it's still pretty fast if we can keep it under
2 hours/render :).
> ... Actually, this could have been the starting point for a really
> bizarre TiNA CheP image ...
Actually, it certainly has a checkered plane (or at least it looks like
it has one), I just can't see the _sphere_ anywhere :D. Or do I remember
TiNA CheP just wrong way?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Well, if you care to share, we still can pong it :). It'll just take a
> bit longer to render, but it's still pretty fast if we can keep it under
> 2 hours/render :).
The original post has a .zip with all the required files in it. If
you're patient enough, then by all means play with it. :-)
>> ... Actually, this could have been the starting point for a really
>> bizarre TiNA CheP image ...
>
> Actually, it certainly has a checkered plane (or at least it looks like
> it has one), I just can't see the _sphere_ anywhere :D. Or do I remember
> TiNA CheP just wrong way?
TiNA CheP for "This Is Not A CHEckered Plane"? I don't see the sphere
part in that. :-) Actually, I think the problem is that it *still has*
the checkered plane. Of course, if you want to do your own version of
the image, you can work on that. ;-)
--
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when you know how to render a
truly photorealistic compact disc, and you're not going to tell anyone
(least of all a POV user ;) ).
Alex McLeod a.k.a. Giant Robot Messiah
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
William Tracy wrote:
>
> The original post has a .zip with all the required files in it. If
> you're patient enough, then by all means play with it. :-)
Argh, I should learn to check the attachments before posting (my
newsreader shows the images automatically) :p.
>> Actually, it certainly has a checkered plane (or at least it looks like
>> it has one), I just can't see the _sphere_ anywhere :D. Or do I remember
>> TiNA CheP just wrong way?
>
> TiNA CheP for "This Is Not A CHEckered Plane"? I don't see the sphere
> part in that. :-) Actually, I think the problem is that it *still has*
> the checkered plane. Of course, if you want to do your own version of
> the image, you can work on that. ;-)
Exactly what I tried to say - the picture would fall nicely to "This is
not RSOCP" -category, but it definedly has the checkered plane.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethis zbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>
> Exactly what I tried to say - the picture would fall nicely to "This is
> not RSOCP" -category, but it definedly has the checkered plane.
TINA RefS?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Cousin Ricky wrote:
> TINA RefS?
>
Nice. ;-)
--
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when you steal computers to
build render farms with.
Taps a.k.a. Tapio Vocadlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
