 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Verm wrote:
> :-) did you see my post on p.off-topic on the 29th about IBM's new
> screen technology?
No, I haven't read OT in several years. I still remember having 200+
messages a day, and how much time it took up ;)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Chambers nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 30-01-2007 15:00:
> OK, so the scene is crap. I hate the walls. The table is minimalistic.
> The CDs and Newton's Cradle are all right, but I didn't model those
> (the CDs are Rune's, I believe, and I got Newton's Cradle off of
> POV-World). They're just for scale, anyway.
>
> I just had an idea for a monitor that I wanted to try, and that's what I
> did. Personally, I love the idea, and I'd love to get a screen like
> this. I showed it to Kimberly, and she hated it, though :(
>
> FYI, the screen is 32 inches across, and 18 inches down (16x9 ratio),
> meaning it would be considered a 37" monitor. That's a beast, but a
> beautiful one, IMO :)
>
> ...Chambers
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Can you send me a working one? Please!
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
OFFICE ARITHMETIC
Smart boss + smart employee = profit
Smart boss + dumb employee = production
Dumb boss + smart employee = promotion
Dumb boss + dumb employee = overtime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Chambers wrote:
> Verm wrote:
>> :-) did you see my post on p.off-topic on the 29th about IBM's new
>> screen technology?
>
> No, I haven't read OT in several years. I still remember having 200+
> messages a day, and how much time it took up ;)
Fair point - it was just pointing you to a "real" version of this
http://www.flickr.com/photos/abirkill/371931493/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Verm wrote:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/abirkill/371931493/
IIRC, it's not the same thing. Isn't this the model with a camera in
the back? If it's the one I'm thinking of, then it just takes a picture
of whatever is behind it, and uses that as the desktop wallpaper.
And if it IS the same thing, that horrible frame ruins it. Surely they
could find a better color than *black*.
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben, those PC-HUDs (like in a F-18) where are they manufactured?
As for the wall, use something more relax, beige or gray, maybe with a
fine grain in it. This way we'll see better on the screen. And talking
of which, I suggest you dim the background color (make it slightly
opaque) it would make the display more readable for the user.
Just couple ideas on the already pretty nice work!
Simon
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
