 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
My answer is yes ;oD
How did you do the text? CSG?
--
-Nekar Xenos
"The truth is out there"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmm...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tag povrayorg> schreef in bericht
news:45652ec1@news.povray.org...
> No, I don't know what is it supposed to mean. Just a weird idea that
> occurred to me suddenly. I suppose it's up to the viewer to decide.
>
The Yes is overpowering, even crunching some poor No's :-)
It looks quite convincing. I like the balance between the different hues and
the textural contrast.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nekar wrote:
> How did you do the text? CSG?
Yes. :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> The Yes is overpowering, even crunching some poor No's :-)
But he's outnumbered! Like Neo versus several Smiths. I think it's fair
enough. :)
Nice image and concept, indeed.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> No, I don't know what is it supposed to mean. Just a weird idea that
> occurred to me suddenly. I suppose it's up to the viewer to decide.
Never underestimate the power of the negative.
Thought provoking!
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmailcom> schreef in bericht
news:web.4565686e10103d2ef2ff13290@news.povray.org...
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
>> The Yes is overpowering, even crunching some poor No's :-)
>
> But he's outnumbered! Like Neo versus several Smiths. I think it's fair
> enough. :)
>
>
Somehow, they look dejected... no real stamina left :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes.
--
Dan
GoofyGraffix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
maybe...
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> No, I don't know what is it supposed to mean. Just a weird idea that
> occurred to me suddenly. I suppose it's up to the viewer to decide.
Looking closer, the E of the YES is sitting on a NO, making it look
unbalanced somehow. Either the E should be tipped, or the whole thing
looks like it's floating.
It looks like it would make a nice background for anyone who has two
screens of vastly different sizes on Windows, as XP duplicates the
background on both screens but clips the image on the smaller screen to
only show the middle. (For example, if you have a Media Center driving a
TV as the second display.)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Scruffitarianism - Where T-shirt, jeans,
and a three-day beard are "Sunday Best."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
