> Just playing with isosurface, but really too long to render :-\> 26h on a XP3200+...> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Excellent image.
> Just playing with isosurface, but really too long to render :-\> 26h on a XP3200+...
So you're saying a re-render at 1600x1200 for wallpaper is out of the
question then?
Oskar
> Excellent image.> > >> Just playing with isosurface, but really too long to render :-\>> 26h on a XP3200+...> > > So you're saying a re-render at 1600x1200 for wallpaper is out of the > question then?> > > Oskar
Yes ! lol...
s.f### [at] tiscalifr news:41fcca29@news.povray.org> Just playing with isosurface, but really too long to render :-\
For such obejects tesselating them into a hi-quality smoothmesh could
probably give x10 speedup with same quality (only with bigger memory
usage).
--
http://www.raf256.com/3d/
Rafal Maj 'Raf256', home page - http://www.raf256.com/me/
Computer Graphics
LightBeam wrote:
> Just playing with isosurface, but really too long to render :-\> 26h on a XP3200+...> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------>
I see a lot of black spots on the edges of the front object along the
rims of the holes and the objects in the back have a lot of noise that
looks unnatural to me. Too much focal blur perhaps?
--
Maurice
LightBeam wrote:
> Just playing with isosurface, but really too long to render :-\> 26h on a XP3200+...> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Just out of curiosity. Do you add the title and your name in the bottom
right corner in a post processing step or is it in the source?
--
Maurice
> LightBeam wrote:> >> Just playing with isosurface, but really too long to render :-\>> 26h on a XP3200+...>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>> Just out of curiosity. Do you add the title and your name in the bottom > right corner in a post processing step or is it in the source?
Gimp...
fr news: