|
 |
Mike Raiford wrote:
> andrel wrote:
>
>> I though about that also, and decided that I could not do it.
>> You can not just take somebody else's images and put them on
>> another web site. It could be in the form of a digest like
>> thing on the pov ray site though. On the other hand, they would
>> have to spend some time on it and their time may be scarce.
>> Can anyone solve this problem?
>
>
> Hm. I didn't think about the IP issues, but, yes, you're right. Though--
> It's such a tantalizing idea, would make for a neat page...
IMHO it should be done, especially as the rest of the world uses
this cliche to refer to us. I checked the website if it was perhaps
already there, but it wasn't yet :( I think in the community page
would be a nice spot.
> Maintenence would be a bit of a problem.
It sure would, there are too many of them to be on one page, so
they have to be organized, possibly in more than one way.
> .... I have another idea, however. Those that want their
> "classic-cliche" image featured could always submit it to the website.
>
perhaps you could ask the web team if you can join them and do
this as your special interest?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:27:08 +0200, Vincenzo Marchese
<v.m### [at] arsretia net> wrote:
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>--------------000302060500000509000108
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Hi you all,
>
>I would like to have comments on my contribute to the rsoacp series.
>
>I have stolen the rusty texture somewhere ... ;)
>
>Thanks
>Vincenzo
>
nice image. One nitpick (sorry): it looks like the
sphere is floating in the air, not resting on the
floor. If this is your intent than never mind :D
--
to all the companies who wait until a large user base becomes
dependant on their freeware, then shafting said happy campers with
mandatory payment for continued usage. I spit on your grave.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
> Hm. I didn't think about the IP issues, but, yes, you're right. Though--
> It's such a tantalizing idea, would make for a neat page...
> Maintenence would be a bit of a problem.
>
why not to propose as a RSOACP as a IRTC theme?
--
a presto, Stefano Tessarin:
Post a reply to this message
|
|
