 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Is this better? I know, the face still has a few more particles than the
remaining scene (well, just like about 4000 or so..), but some emphasis
should still be put on her face and expression, rather than her entire body.
Your comment was very helpful, I've got to admit that! I've always been
watching her face and how it makes the smile visible, but sure, the
remaining body should be almost as visible.
--
"Tim Nikias v2.0"
Homepage: <http://www.nolights.de>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'memory2.jpg' (40 KB)
Preview of image 'memory2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like it a lot better, I think it actually communicates your original
idea better. And the lack of the signature graphic is better.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I like it a lot better, I think it actually communicates your original
> idea better.
Thanks, I agree, this version is better.
>And the lack of the signature graphic is better.
Well, on my website there still is one, but smaller, as the final image is
larger... Don't know why I put a sig on the image when it's still WIP, that
aside, no need to put sigs on images here in the newsgroups... Probably the
fun of having created another image after a long pause (of scripting the
particle system) made me think that I'd better properly mark my image. :-)
--
"Tim Nikias v2.0"
Homepage: <http://www.nolights.de>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Nikias v2.0 wrote:
> Is this better? I know, the face still has a few more particles than the
> remaining scene (well, just like about 4000 or so..), but some emphasis
Yes, it's a lot better. Now there is a balance to the body without being too
obvious.
> should still be put on her face and expression, rather than her entire
> body. Your comment was very helpful, I've got to admit that! I've always
Glad I could be of some help :)
> been watching her face and how it makes the smile visible, but sure, the
> remaining body should be almost as visible.
>
I make the same mistake every now and then. Focussing too much on one part
and losing the balance in the overall picture.
--
Ger
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Nikias v2.0 wrote:
> Final version is now available on my website. I've put a link to a 1280x960
> PNG version as well (411kb), as the JPEG does show some colorbanding. If
> you're interested, have a look:
>
> <http://www.nolights.de/v2gallery/images/memory.html>
>
> Regards,
> Tim
Sweet! I see more detail on the face now.
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Nikias v2.0 wrote:
> Is this better? I know, the face still has a few more particles than the
> remaining scene (well, just like about 4000 or so..), but some emphasis
> should still be put on her face and expression, rather than her entire body.
> Your comment was very helpful, I've got to admit that! I've always been
> watching her face and how it makes the smile visible, but sure, the
> remaining body should be almost as visible.
Better, except that big blob in the middle is destracting :-)
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Better, except that big blob in the middle is destracting :-)
Yup, that one annoyed me too. In the version I've put on my website, I check
the raindrops for vicinity of the camera, if they're closer than .5 units,
they get removed. That gets rid of the too large drops near the camera.
--
"Tim Nikias v2.0"
Homepage: <http://www.nolights.de>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Nikias v2.0" <#macro timnikias (@) #local = "gmx.net" #end> wrote
in message news:4087ab82@news.povray.org...
> Final version is now available on my website. I've put a link to a
1280x960
> PNG version as well (411kb), as the JPEG does show some
colorbanding. If
> you're interested, have a look:
>
> <http://www.nolights.de/v2gallery/images/memory.html>
I'm liking this a lot Tim, excellent work!
~Steve~
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> --
> "Tim Nikias v2.0"
> Homepage: <http://www.nolights.de>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I'm liking this a lot Tim, excellent work!
Thanks for the praise, Steve! :-)
--
"Tim Nikias v2.0"
Homepage: <http://www.nolights.de>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Nikias v2.0 wrote:
> Is this better? I know, the face still has a few more particles than the
> remaining scene (well, just like about 4000 or so..), but some emphasis
> should still be put on her face and expression, rather than her entire body.
> Your comment was very helpful, I've got to admit that! I've always been
> watching her face and how it makes the smile visible, but sure, the
> remaining body should be almost as visible.
>
>
any chance of a code snippet for the 'blob' in the middle ?
i know of a paperweight i'd like to try modelling
glass sphere with about 30 of those inside, flattened bottom
stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
