 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
LightBeam wrote:
> No light, just radiosity. 20mn on my Athlon XP 2500+
>
>
> ------/ LightBeam /------
> http://empirium.free.fr
Nice looking, you're really good radiosity.
If you want even more replies to your posts you should post in JPEG2000.
:-)
JC trolling again (I'm sorry, but all these posts are really funny)
--
http://exether.free.fr/irtc (more IRTC stats !)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
404b9e12$1@news.povray.org...
> Nice looking, you're really good radiosity.
> If you want even more replies to your posts you should post in JPEG2000.
> :-)
>
> JC trolling again (I'm sorry, but all these posts are really funny)
> http://exether.free.fr/irtc (more IRTC stats !)
LOOOoooooOOL ;-))
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscali fr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:404b9a8e@news.povray.org...
> No light, just radiosity. 20mn on my Athlon XP 2500+
>
>
> ------/ LightBeam /------
> http://empirium.free.fr
>
very nice, keep up the good work
jsj
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"JC (Exether)" <no### [at] spamfr> wrote in message
news:404b9e12$1@news.povray.org...
> LightBeam wrote:
<snip />
> If you want even more replies to your posts you should post in JPEG2000.
> :-)
LOL
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
404b9c93$1@news.povray.org...
> Ah, there it is -- sub-surface scattering on the green sphere.
Beooootiful!
Not really, juste transparent texture with "fade_distance" at 5% of the
sphere radius.
> I really like how you made the blue surface of the table look
realistically
> painted too.
The big bright sphere around the scene makes all the work. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ooh, nice, nice nice ;)
Love the reflection in the floor!
"LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscalifr> wrote in message
news:404b9a8e@news.povray.org...
> No light, just radiosity. 20mn on my Athlon XP 2500+
>
>
> ------/ LightBeam /------
> http://empirium.free.fr
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
LightBeam wrote:
> No light, just radiosity. 20mn on my Athlon XP 2500+
>
>
> ------/ LightBeam /------
> http://empirium.free.fr
>
>
>
>
like the blue surface
do me a favour, just do the vase inside the sphere
in the middle of the blue bit
pretty, pretty please
source would be even nicer, just for the vase though
green sphere has a white vert bar, artifact? it might appear
correct in a jpeg2000 though, mind you we'd lose the rest as well.
somehow the spout and handle of the teapot don't look diametrically
opposed, also the teapot lid looks welded shut
:-) (this symbol applies to certain of above)
stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:56:53 +0100, "LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscalifr>
wrote:
>No light, just radiosity. 20mn on my Athlon XP 2500+
I think radiosity might have taken out the sterility of this image.
It's too clinical.
>
>
>------/ LightBeam /------
>http://empirium.free.fr
>
>
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:56:53 +0100, "LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscalifr>
wrote:
>No light, just radiosity. 20mn on my Athlon XP 2500+
Oops. I misunderstood. Mmm, that's a shame that radiosity is giving
that rather sterile look. Perhaps that's not the source of the problem
after all.
>
>
>------/ LightBeam /------
>http://empirium.free.fr
>
>
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
LightBeam wrote:
> No light, just radiosity. 20mn on my Athlon XP 2500+
Impressive. I don't like the lighting setup, though; the glowing white
panel (for lack of a better name) in the back makes the scene feel a
little blinding somehow, as though I have to squint to see the objects,
whereas the reflection of what I assume is a similar panel behind the
camera is uniformly dull.
If you're in the mood to play around with the scene, I'd like to see a
version with a dimmer back panel and a brighter front panel, and maybe a
human silhouette between the front panel and the camera to add some
complexity to the reflection. Or else just post the source and let us
play with it... :)
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
