 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jellby" <jel### [at] M-yahoo com> wrote in message
news:402809e5@news.povray.org...
> Caution. The hexagon pattern is "made of" hexagonal prisms, it will give
> hexagons when the surface is perpendicular to these prisms, but something
> quite ugly when the surface is parallel. Can it be "wrapped around"?
Try using UVMapping?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stephen parkinson wrote:
> istr eye structure similar to flies
> hexagon based
> can't remember the word! sad
>
"compound eye" (biol.)
(German: "Facettenauge")
Wolfgang
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I answer the criticism about my dragonfly's eyes
I started with photographical documents.
The scale of theeyes is to big to see the hexagon cells. Only the reflexion
of ligth forms an hexagon as you can see on the photo. I could'nt represent
that, its too difficult for me!!!!
news:4027ec05@news.povray.org...
> Among other things, Remy Closset wrote:
>
> > The first dtawing I send here
> > Entirely done with moray
>
> I love dragonflies.
>
> However, this one looks too reflective, especially the eyes, do they have
> any "structure" (eye-cells, whatever they're called)? And, although
> dragonflies have short legs (they can't walk), this one's look too short.
>
> --
> light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
> 9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
> 0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'aeshnetete.jpg' (13 KB)
Preview of image 'aeshnetete.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Among other things, Remy Closset wrote:
> I answer the criticism about my dragonfly's eyes
> I started with photographical documents.
> The scale of theeyes is to big to see the hexagon cells. Only the
> reflexion of ligth forms an hexagon as you can see on the photo. I
> could'nt represent that, its too difficult for me!!!!
You're right, the hexagonal structure is not apparent (maybe a
definition/quality issue), but there is clearly something not quite right
in your eyes (I mean, the dragonfly's eyes). You should try some kind of
strongly blurred reflection at least (there have been some threads about it
in these groups).
--
light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I answer the criticism about my dragonfly's eyes
I started with photographical documents.
The scale of theeyes is to big to see the hexagon cells. Only the reflexion
of ligth forms an hexagon as you can see on the photo. I could'nt represent
that, its too difficult for me!!!!
> news:4027ec05@news.povray.org...
> > Among other things, Remy Closset wrote:
> >
> > > The first dtawing I send here
> > > Entirely done with moray
> >
> > I love dragonflies.
> >
> > However, this one looks too reflective, especially the eyes, do they
have
> > any "structure" (eye-cells, whatever they're called)? And, although
> > dragonflies have short legs (they can't walk), this one's look too
short.
> >
> > --
> > light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
> > 9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
> > 0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby
> >
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
