 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Andrew Coppin
Subject: WIP: Let's be logical about this... (~130 KB)
Date: 25 Mar 2003 15:53:45
Message: <3e80c1d9@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorry about the pun...
Yes, I *know* it's not finished. (Just to clarify - does anyone actually
know what it's supposed to be???)
Comments, opinions, flames...
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Logic4.png' (131 KB)
Preview of image 'Logic4.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tim Nikias v2 0
Subject: Re: Let's be logical about this... (~130 KB)
Date: 25 Mar 2003 15:59:16
Message: <3e80c324@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It seems to me like some boolean logic, though
with errors: those rounded connectors don't seem
to possess any logic, they're sometimes true/green
and sometimes false/red. It doesn't seem to depend
upon the entry point (the colors are sometimes
reversed for that as well).
--
Tim Nikias v2.0
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights
Email: Tim### [at] gmx de
> Sorry about the pun...
>
> Yes, I *know* it's not finished. (Just to clarify - does anyone actually
> know what it's supposed to be???)
>
> Comments, opinions, flames...
> Andrew.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Daniel Nilsson
Subject: Re: Let's be logical about this... (~130 KB)
Date: 25 Mar 2003 16:36:05
Message: <3e80cbc5@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Each block is a 1-bit adder (right output is sum, left output is carry)
The whole thing will be a 4-bit adder adding the numbers 5 and 4 giving the
result 9.
Daniel Nilsson
"Andrew Coppin" <orp### [at] btinternetcom> wrote in message
news:3e80c1d9@news.povray.org...
> Sorry about the pun...
>
> Yes, I *know* it's not finished. (Just to clarify - does anyone actually
> know what it's supposed to be???)
>
> Comments, opinions, flames...
> Andrew.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Yes, I *know* it's not finished. (Just to clarify - does anyone
actually
> know what it's supposed to be???)
Hey! That's a model of the new AMD 64 right? Can't wait to see the final
image! ;)
-Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Andrew Coppin wrote:
>Sorry about the pun...
>
>Yes, I *know* it's not finished. (Just to clarify - does anyone actually
>know what it's supposed to be???)
It's a better mousetrap! Better widen your front gate...
RG - the world will beat a pathway through your freshly planted geraniums
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:51:32 -0000, Andrew Coppin wrote:
> Sorry about the pun...
>
> Yes, I *know* it's not finished. (Just to clarify - does anyone actually
> know what it's supposed to be???)
>
> Comments, opinions, flames...
> Andrew.
A logic circut showing different results from different input?
--
light_source#macro G(E)sphere{z+E*y*5e-3.04rotate-z*E*6pigment{rgbt#end{
20*y-10#local n=162;1}#while(n)#local n=n-.3;G(n)x}}G(-n).7}}#end//GregE
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The halves of the lower AND in each adder seem to be coloured wrongly.
--
merge{#local i=-11;#while(i<11)#local
i=i+.1;sphere{<i*(i*i*(.05-i*i*(4e-7*i*i+3e-4))-3)10*sin(i)30>.5}#end
pigment{rgbt 1}interior{media{emission x}}hollow}// Mark Weyer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mark Weyer wrote:
>
> The halves of the lower AND in each adder seem to be coloured wrongly.
Not if you use my logic :)
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Andrew Coppin
Subject: Re: Let's be logical about this... (~130 KB)
Date: 26 Mar 2003 15:59:59
Message: <3e8214cf@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks people.
Yes, it's a binary adder.
I repeat: it is NOT finished yet - there are still some connections missing
from the picture (but influencing the logic anyway). That's why it doesn't
make a lotta sense yet.
This thing involves *miles* of code... I've manually placed tonnes of
cylinders and spheres (for the joints), not to mention the gates themselves.
I think I really need to rethink the way I'm coding this or I'll be here
till Christmas!
But anyway, at least people recognise it as a set of logic gates. That's
something!
Thanks.
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Andrew Coppin
Subject: Re: Let's be logical about this... (~130 KB)
Date: 26 Mar 2003 16:12:04
Message: <3e8217a4@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Each block is a 1-bit adder (right output is sum, left output is carry)
> The whole thing will be a 4-bit adder adding the numbers 5 and 4 giving
the
> result 9.
Congratulations - we have a winner! :-)
Andrew.
PS. Couldn't be bothered with 64-bit arithmatic...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
